Justice for All
Logo
Address
E-mail: immortalguardofiran@yahoo.com,
Freedom, Justice, Honor
******************************************************************
April-2009
Index:
Justice for All-Blue Print
His Imperial Majesty King of Kings Reza PAHLAVI the Great-Party Discipline
Thank You Opposition for Wasting Eight Years of Golden Opportunity
Stop Thinking about Iran, Start Acting for Iran
Book Review
Justice for All-Blue Print
Mission Statement:
Justice for All is committed to the protection, and enhancement of the quality of life for all members of our community through service function and expressive function that comes from education and from promoting and upholding good political, social and economic standards and practices.
His Imperial Majesty King of Kings Reza PAHLAVI the Great-Party Discipline
His Imperial Majesty King of Kings Reza PAHLAVI the Great got a reputation as a well discipline person, even His Imperial Majesty was called a dictator.
Also a dictator ruler was defined as a ruler who was a sole governor of a nation, and civil-society which was composed of media, and parliament would have lesser degree in shaping politics, and public would not have much to say in political process.
There was no doubt that His Imperial Majesty King of Kings Reza PAHLAVI governed Iran within His own discretion, and did not allow others to make most of decision, and Iran was not governed in term of Western democracy.
His Imperial Majesty had no any other option but to enforce party discipline in Iran in order to govern Iran and His Imperial Majesty was not a dictator.
During time that His Imperial Majesty was governing Iran, Iran's political, social and economic climate was chaotic. There were war lords that they were trying to rule each corner of Iran within their own discretion, and were undermining sovereignty of Iran as a nation, and opened Iran's door for England, France and Russia to play Great Game with Iran, and disintegrating Iran's national sovereignty. In addition, there were individuals that they were in media, as well as, parliament that they were working in best interest of England, France and Russia and were ignoring cause of Iran
As a result, His Imperial Majesty was enforcing party discipline in Iran in order to enforce political stability, social order and vibrant economy. If His Imperial Majesty would not enforce party discipline, Iran would not survive and would fall apart within a short time frame.
Thank You Opposition for Wasting Eight Years of Golden Opportunity
These fossil Iranian were always saying that the US did not allow them to do regime change in Iran, and if only the US would show a green light, they would do the job.
Former US president George BUSH during his Union Speech called the theocratic regime in Iran as an axis of evil which was a threat to world peace, and had to go. Plus, former president George BUSH wanted democracy to flourish in Iran. Quite frankly, the above Union Speech was a clear green signed for Iranian dissidents that they called themselves “opposition” to organize and mobilize themselves against the Islamic Republic in Iran which was a terminally ill, and it was an illegitimate state in Iran which did not have consent, and will of Iranian to govern to be toppled. However, Iranian in the US and most populated in California began to think for their own self-interest and did not take any kind of action for emancipation of Iran.
Iranian began to form satellite television stations which were zooming in Iran, and became a hot commodity for a moment. The US began to fund these television stations, and quickly some television stations became rich, and no longer needed to rely on charity television funds. Moreover, there were others that they could not have television stations, but they had websites that the websites kept them in touch with people inside of Iran.
Individuals with the websites began to draft a list of member names, as the US administration was paying the organizations in order to funnel money in Iran with intention of toppling the regime in Iran. Also, these organizations registered their organizations under non profit charity charity so they would enjoy tax benefit under section 503 (2).
It was during this moment that the regime in Iran decided to cool down with Iranian dissidents, and began to make back room deal with each and everyone of them. The regime in Iran began to return confiscate assets to them, and some women became concubines of some mullahs and got their confiscate assets back. The regime in Iran made more offer to them that they would sell names of their members, and would receive monetary compensation. These organizations accepted the cleric's offer. After all, they were victims of the regime, and in their eyes same people of none cleric made the infamous 1979 fiasco, and confiscated their assets so what now Iran was moving toward destruction, let it be.
There was more into story of betraying Iran, these television stations began to play a very good role to dis-interest Iranian about future of Iran. One television would declared a day as a day of national uprising, another television station would ask its viewers to stay home for their own safety and security which caused the regime to crack down people, less people, in streets. These battle of television stations continued for sometimes, but it ended. People figured out it that it was all a game.
Now, these organizations noticed that every year during cha har shanbeh sori public were celebrating the cha har shanbeh sori, and decided to get credit for it. These organizations would appear on television and would ask people to come out of their homes and celebrate the Iran's national occasion. It was irrelevant Iranian would come out of their homes and would celebrate the occasion and these organizations would get a YouTube video clip of the event and would show the clip to the US administration and would ask for funds that this was how they organized the event in Iran.
All in all, Iranian had eight years to finish the regime in Iran and they did not, and now the US and the regime in Iran were going to become a friend, and His Imperial Majesty King of Kings Reza Cyrus PAHLAVI II needed to do a miracle to save Iran from hands of mullah. His Imperial Majesty needed to defend Iran against the world now.
Stop Thinking about Iran, Start Acting for Iran
His Imperial Majesty, Light of Aryan, King of Kings Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI asked Iranian to think about Iran, so Iran would be emancipated from hands of occupier. Indeed, Iranian had obligation to think about future of Iran. Indeed, Iranian began to ponder about future of Iran, and wasted 30 years, and allowed the regime in Iran to prolong itself for 30 years.
Thus, there was enough thinking about Iran, and now time was working for Iran, and not by posting names on a website, and asking US administration for fund, but working toward freedom of Iran voluntarily, and from bottom of heart. Creating underground network that no one would know because if a country would know that there was indeed a network which was working toward freedom of Iran that country would expose and dispose that network.
Book Review
Caesar WARRINGTON
"Islam: A Mosaic, Not a Monolith" by author Vartan GREGORIAN
http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1SP38JKYFFVJS?ie=UTF8&display=public&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview&page=6
"Huntington [Samuel P. Huntington, author of THE CLASH Of CIVILIZATIONS And The REMAKING Of The WORLD ORDER] and others who write about a clash of civilizations do not recognize that class, tribal, family, personal, ethnic, cultural, economic, and national interests have always defied a unity of purpose that transcends all these divisions. As shown above, instances when the Muslim world was a unified monolith have been extremely rare. Throughout Islamic history, the gravitational pull of regional, dynastic, and since the nineteenth century nationalist interests has consistently outweighed the spiritual affiliations of some idealized, transcendent, organic umma. If history is a guide, it shows that in Islam, as in most major religions, there is a broad gulf between the ideal of unity and the realities on the ground." (ISLAM: A MOSAIC, NOT A MONOLITH, pp. 110-111). The above paragraph provides the gist of Vartan Gregorian's excellent book, dispelling certain myths about both the Islamic world and Islamist extremism which are being promoted by some politicians, journalists, writers and religious leaders in the West.
Gregorian shows that the idea of a totalitarian Pan-Islamic juggernaut determined to engulf the world and submit it to "sharia" law not only is unlikely it has no historical foundation. While the fears of Islamist extremism are naturally not unwarranted and should be taken seriously, Gregorian also wants us to keep in mind the intense struggles between modernity and traditionalism, as well as religion and nationality in the Muslim world. Indeed, except for relatively brief periods in history, the Umma (the Muslim community) has mostly existed in a world fragmented by rival dynasties and states, willing to ally themselves with outsiders against each other. He reminds us that "Sharia" law, dreaded by many as some sort of universal Islamic system of punishment and coercion, is not a unified body of law, but rather exists within four specific schools of thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi and Hanbali), each with their own levels of interpretation.
Islamist ideology itself is shown to be quite varied, running through a spectrum that includes the most uncompromisingly fanatical to those more moderate and willing to work within the system and participate in electoral politics. Gregorian goes further to explain Muslim extremism as historically a tool that's been used both by and against western dominance. What started as a reaction to the presence of European colonialism in North Africa and the Near East was also nourished and utilized by Great Britain and the United States against Marxist and other socialist movements in the region during the Cold War.
Despite popular conceptions, fostered by governments and media for their own advantage, Gregorian finds Islamism to be in decline. After the defeat of the Soviets in Afghanistan the Islamist movement fractured and struggles with competing constituencies and agendas. While acknowledging it as an optimistic view, Gregorian references Gilles Kepel (from his 2002 book, JIHAD: The TRAIL Of POLITICAL ISLAM) on the belief that "the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, represented not a growing threat from Islamist extremism but the reverse: they were a symbol of its `isolation, fragmentation and decline.'"
Vartan Gregorian was born in Tabriz, Iran, but is from an Armenian background. In addition to serving as president of Brown University, founding dean and provost of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, and president of the New York Public Library, Gregorian is presently the president of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. ISLAM: A MOSAIC, NOT A MONOLITH grew out of a report submitted to Carnegie's trustees in the summer of 2001 on the need to promote public understanding for America's Muslims and also the need to ease their integration into American society. After September 11, 2001, the report took on a global perspective, developing into the more comprehensive survey that is this book. The next time you are in your local bookstore, wandering in either the Middle Eastern History or Religion aisles, ignore the glossed-over apologistic junk of Karen Armstrong on one end and the Islamophobic polemics of Robert Spencer on the other. Instead, choose to give this book a look over. You won't be disappointed.
Signed by Pawn
No comments:
Post a Comment