Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi Media and Revolution in Iran

There is one question in everyone's mind that how could Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi could abort revolution in Iran? It would be interesting to follow Canada's foot step to understand how Canada kept the US invasion of Canada at bay.

It was in 1922 Canada decided to have a public broadcasting in order to prevent Nazi values to disseminate in Canada. In addition, Canada was protecting its air wave from the US invasion of Canada. As a result, Canada made Canadian Broadcasting Radio Corporation, and later on it became Canadian Broadcasting Corporation which has monopoly power over Canada's broadcasting. It is costing a taxpayer $33.00 CDN annually to fund this program. The above history of broadcasting is in nutshell.

England, United States of America, France and other media outlets  used their mediums to disseminate false information about Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi and depicted him as a monster to Iranians and rest of the world.

As time is passing on, it is becoming clear that he was not a monster that was depicted by the West and some naive individuals in Iran who were pursuing their own self - interest.

It is clear now why England, US, France and other nations were eager to topple the Pahlavi Dynasty. Today, the Middle East and North Africa are engulf of fire so that the industrial military complex can sell weapons.

Is this the kind of world that we want to live in?

Dr. Daniel Shayesteh Converts to Christianity

This blog claims that the Islamic Republic of Iran is using Islam as an instrument to committee atrocity in Iran and outside of Iran. The regime in Iran is a totalitarian system and seeks conformity from people without doubt. Now, you may please watch this video clip and see for yourself what Islamic Republic of Iran means by a former Revolutionary Guard.

Media and the Islamic Republic of Iran

Media plays a major role in shaping public opinion. It may foment revolution in a country, and causes destruction in a country. Since post 9/11 George Bush adopted foreign policy of regime change and targeted the Islamic Republic of Iran as an axis of evil. The US administration allocated substantial amount of funds toward media outlets to cause unrest in Iran. However, the US policy was not about regime change in Iran, it was meant to shake the regime in Iran.

Iranians in Iran began to watch Western programs and Iranian expatriation in the West began to formulate television programs that gear toward Iranians in Iran and declare the regime in Iran to be bankrupt from legitimacy and consent of people to govern. However, these media outlets did not have any essence to do anything serious against the regime in Iran. Nowadays, the market for regime change is slow and the above media outlets are not charging forward anymore against the regime in Iran.

The regime in Iran has quality of a totalitarian regime.   As Hannah Arendt defined totalitarian regime as a system that it controls every facade of society by imposing laws to legitimacy its brutality against people.  

The Islamic Republic of Iran does not tolerate and subordination in any shape or form. Anyone censure the regime in any shape or form would be found accused and convicted as anti - revolutionary.

Recently, the Islamic Republic of Iran is developing television programs which are comedy to take public tension away. Furthermore, the regime is using television programs to censure itself.

One of the film is Year 1500 (2121) Tehran by Mehran Moridi that explains everything in Iran would be same. High inflation rate, moral police officers are patrolling streets and imposing Islamic laws. There would not be any changes. In a sitcom 'Made a Joke' or 'Shoukhi Kardim', there is high charge materials against the regime in Iran for doing negligence toward public goods.

Khomeini HENDI was a staunch supporter of abolishing music in Iran. The Revolutionary Guards would patrol every corner of streets and would be witch hunting anyone listening to musics. Now, the regime in Iran is playing lively music.

As a result, it can be said that one more time the regime in Iran knows how to manipulate public media in order to prolong itself in Iran.

Who is Masoumeh or Masih ALINEZHAD/ALINEJAD?

Who is Masoumeh ALINEZHAD/ALINEJAD?

On September 11^th, 1976 Masoumeh ALINEZHAD was born in northern part of Iran. She changed her name from Masoumeh to Masih which means Jesus. In 1994, she began to take interest in political life and discussing domestic affair of Iran. In 2001, she began to write articles for Hambastig news paper. In 2008, she ran an article against Iran's president Mahmoud AHMADINZHAD under title of “Song of Dolphins”. In this paper, she wrote a fast and furious article against the president that how he was redistributing Iran's wealth among individuals were living below poverty line. She claimed that these individuals could not escape poverty and were always looking for hand out. This article raised anger among public and caused Ms. ALINEJAD to flee Iran. Now, she is in self – imposed exile in England and is working as a journalist.

There are many questions about Ms. ALINEJAD, and let's ask these constructive questions about her integrity.

1. She fled Iran because of her article criticizing AHMADINZHA. It does not make sense. It is true that the regime does not tolerate insubordination, but it is not life threatening situation. Does it?
2. She immigrated to England and gain employment with Voice of America and other media outlets. How is it possible someone gain employment in the West that fast?
3. How is it possible someone who is learning English as a second language to have a firm grasp of English language and gain employment with the media?
4. How is it possible for her to pay her tuition fee to the Oxford Brooks University?
5. The media outlets are questioning her political view is leading to favor a certain type of reflection in her writing. It is not matter of debate. Anyone knows that everyone has a bias. For example, Fox News endorses Republican agenda and CNN endorses Democrat agenda. Thus, the media outlets that they discuss her political view as a favourable leverage toward certain article, it does not make sense.

Future of Iraq

In 1997, The Project for New American Century formed as a think - tank organization to advance US interest around the world within framework of the US as a global constable. In 1998, the above think - tank drafted a manifesto under title of "Rebuilding America's Defence" which stated the North African countries like Libya, and Middle East countries like Syria, Iraq and Iran are posing threat to the US because their armies are becoming strong. Thus, the US must do regime change in the above nations.

In post 9/11 the US is having military excursions around the world, and doing regime change under disguise of freedom and democracy. Furthermore, the Middle East region has plenty of oil resources for next fifty years to come by, the US since first Persian Gulf War has established strong base in Saudi Arabia to make profit from war.

As a result, it is no surprise that today Iraq is at state of civil war. It is clear that Iraq would be divided among three ethnic and religious groups of Shia, Sunni and Kurds. Once, Kurdish people in Iraq form their own autonomy, other kurdish people in Iran, Turkey and Syria will begin to demand for self  - autonomy and the region will be engulf of fire.