Friday, June 15, 2012
Dark Secrets : Inside Bohemian Grove Full Length
Will Bashar Al-Assad Survive?
There is a pending question now that will Bashar Al-Assad supress the unrest in his country and begin to rule his country in a climate that he would like.
Obviously, not because the Western power want him to overthrow him from power and the regime in Iran is trying to hold on him because it is a valuable ally to the regime in Iran.
The bottom line, the regime in Iran will be overthrow at some point in future, and the regime in Iran will be left with Russia to stop regime change in Iran.
It will be a very interesting event to follow.
Obviously, not because the Western power want him to overthrow him from power and the regime in Iran is trying to hold on him because it is a valuable ally to the regime in Iran.
The bottom line, the regime in Iran will be overthrow at some point in future, and the regime in Iran will be left with Russia to stop regime change in Iran.
It will be a very interesting event to follow.
The Stoning of Soraya M.
Jimmy Carter gets Noble Peace Prize for destroying people's life. He is the man who besmirched the King (Shah) for human rights violation. Is this human right in Iran now?
Monday, January 23, 2012
Americans Brought Upon Themselves-9/11
We all heard the statement that Americans brought 9/11 upon themselves because they were interfering with domestic affairs of other nations. However, those 3000 people who died in the twin towers had nothing to do with foreign affairs of the US. Even, there is a possibility that there was a person who did not align his views with US's foreign policy, and now that person's family would not be any supporter of nations who are in need of support. Consequently, those individuals who are using the title of this entry, they are warmongers and justifying their hostile attitudes toward civilians.
Monday, January 16, 2012
Iran makes arrests in scientist’s assassination: speaker
TEHRAN — Iran has made arrests over a scientist’s assassination last week blamed on Israel and the U.S., parliament speaker Ali Larijani said Monday, vowing his country would avenge the death using “non-terrorist” tactics.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/01/16/iran-makes-arrests-in-scientists-assassination-speaker/
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/01/16/iran-makes-arrests-in-scientists-assassination-speaker/
What does Pahlevi Mean?
“This Pehlevi is simply the old name for the Persian language, and there can be little doubt that Pehlevi, which is the Persian name for what is ancient was derived from Pahlav, a hero warrior, which pahlav again is a regular modification of parthav, the name of the Parthians who were the rulers pf Persia for nearly fiver hundred years.
F. Max Muller “Theosophy or Psychological Religion” Cambridge University Press. Page 36.
F. Max Muller “Theosophy or Psychological Religion” Cambridge University Press. Page 36.
Saturday, November 19, 2011
Why Did Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI Leave Iran?
In 1979, King (Shah) Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI left Iran, and He said to reporters that He was leaving Iran because He did not want anymore bloodshed in His beloved country. Now, it does make sense what He was telling us. Just rewind clock of history in Iran, it was during World War II, Russia and England invaded Iran, even Iran declared itself a neutral country, Russia and England careless about Iran's position, and invaded Iran, and began to plundering Iran's oil for their war machinery. King Reza PAHLAVI abdicated from His Throne because Russia and England did resented King Reza PAHLAVI due to His modernization plan for Iran, making Iran a nation-state, as He moved Iran from a conservative base on religion (theology) state and society to a rational and a secular state.
The above superpowers and other ones were thinking that by allowing young princes Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI to ascend to throne, it would be easy to manipulate Him, as well as, preventing Iran from progress. However, the Western powers were wrong, King Reza PAHLAVI continued with His version of modernization of Iran, as it became glorified during celebration of 2500 ceremony in Iran, and Iran indeed moved from a conservative wisdom to a norm and liberal minded society.
The Western power like England, France, and US were not please with King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI's agenda for Iran. It was during Jimmy CARTER's presidency as he ignited fire in Iran, and besmirched the legal system in Iran to be in violation of human rights. The legal system improved its standard in order to meet Red Cross, as well as, the united Nations recommendation. However, the US did not stop interfering in Iran's domestic affairs, CARTER continually pushing agenda of human rights in Iran. King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI left Iran in peace.
Now, looking at North Africa and, particularly, Gaddafi's incident as NATO special forces were roaming around the Libya to topple the regime in Libya it would happened in Iran. Consequently, King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI left Iran in order to stop the bloodshed. Otherwise, the US would launch massive air and ground attack on Iran under elusive banner of freedom for Iran.
Thanks God that King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI was a savvy person, and He did not have ego but a rational mind to save His country from further bloodshed. His Soul Always be Happy in Paradise.
The above superpowers and other ones were thinking that by allowing young princes Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI to ascend to throne, it would be easy to manipulate Him, as well as, preventing Iran from progress. However, the Western powers were wrong, King Reza PAHLAVI continued with His version of modernization of Iran, as it became glorified during celebration of 2500 ceremony in Iran, and Iran indeed moved from a conservative wisdom to a norm and liberal minded society.
The Western power like England, France, and US were not please with King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI's agenda for Iran. It was during Jimmy CARTER's presidency as he ignited fire in Iran, and besmirched the legal system in Iran to be in violation of human rights. The legal system improved its standard in order to meet Red Cross, as well as, the united Nations recommendation. However, the US did not stop interfering in Iran's domestic affairs, CARTER continually pushing agenda of human rights in Iran. King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI left Iran in peace.
Now, looking at North Africa and, particularly, Gaddafi's incident as NATO special forces were roaming around the Libya to topple the regime in Libya it would happened in Iran. Consequently, King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI left Iran in order to stop the bloodshed. Otherwise, the US would launch massive air and ground attack on Iran under elusive banner of freedom for Iran.
Thanks God that King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI was a savvy person, and He did not have ego but a rational mind to save His country from further bloodshed. His Soul Always be Happy in Paradise.
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Decoding Emblem of Islamic Republic of Iran
In 1979, the Pahlavi Dynasty collapsed and it was replaced by theology state of Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI). The new establishment claimed that Iran's flag which had lion and sun emblems had to be purged because they were symbolizing idea of revolt. It replaced with word of Allah instead. It lead to countless mind scratching situation that how this new emblem resembled to word of Allah. It really did not resemble to the word of Allah.
Looking closer at the IRI emblem, it gave clear vision that it was a Satanic emblem. According to the Holy Bible number of 6.6.6 is a beast name. If one dot from each spot is taking, it gives number 6.6.6. The base needs to be count twice for two reasons. One, it is interwoven and there is a a wave on top, in Persian grammar it repeats a letter as counting would be repeated. Interestingly the wave symbol is symbolized the All Seeing Eye. In addition, there is a pentagram in the flag by attaching far corners to each other it gives a pentagram as pentagram would intercept by the area of the wave. Last, the flag was anti-Christ because it is an up-side down Cross. It may claim that it is a sword which is not because it has no grip.
Last, the regime in Iran stated clearly that it engages in spreading corruption on earth to expedite arrival of last Shiite Saint – Imam Mehdi so that they would join his force to topple tyranny around the world, and establish a just society globally.
Wednesday, May 04, 2011
Freemason's role in Pahlavi Dynasty
There are some individuals that they claim in Iran there was a Freemason lodge with name of Forough which assisted His Excellency Amir Abbas HOVEIDA to be appointed to the Prime Minister's Office.
The above allegation would be not have any merit because Freemason was a new concept for Iranian community, and when His Excellency was appointed to the high office, the Freemason was a private club which would not allow other race but white male person to join the club. Recently, the club was facing decline in membership, and began to alter its policy by allowing other faith groups, as well as, race to join the Freemason Society.
The Freemason Society did not support Monarchy state. The Freemason Society always brought people to one common denominator in order to revolt against monarchy establishment. Usually banner of the Freemason Society was about democracy, liberty against tyranny. The Freemason Society deemed the monarchy system as a despotic system, and assisted to mobilize people against the establishment which became evident during French Revolution as the Freemason's lodge would be a place to disseminate information with one another. In addition, the Forefather of the US opposed the idea of the Constitutional Monarchy and formed a republic in the US.
The Freemason Society was one controversial society which had a deep root in European history. There were allegation that the above society incorporated Illuminated doctrine, as well as, Theosophy doctrines. The above societies did not have good reputation, and there were allegations of Satan worship. Alex Jones made a documentary, and it should not be taken as an absolute truth, but he documented that world leaders were taking part in worshiping Satan.
Beside the idea of worshiping Satan, it did make sense that former US President CARTER did not like Pahlavi Dynasty in Iran, and decided to topple the regime in Iran. It also made sense that the US regime had amicable relationship with brute state of Iran because they had an agenda of orchestrating Armageddon.
Good luck for anyone for relying on the US or any foreign entities to assist Iranian dissidents to topple the regime in Iran. It would not happen.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
The Devil We Know: Dealing With The New Iranian Superpower by Robert Baer
1.This author on prologue section page 1 claimed that in 1978 he was 24 years old young man and was on his way to India, as he had short stop in Iran, Tehran during Marshall laws. This author alleged that "the kamikaze taxi driver who drove me into Tehran from the airport that night taught me my first lesson: Iranians can't drive. The way he swoop and darted between the army patrols, I was …+ read more1.This author on prologue section page 1 claimed that in 1978 he was 24 years old young man and was on his way to India, as he had short stop in Iran, Tehran during Marshall laws. This author alleged that "the kamikaze taxi driver who drove me into Tehran from the airport that night taught me my first lesson: Iranians can't drive. The way he swoop and darted between the army patrols, I was convinced he was trying to draw fire. And was it legal to drive down the sidewalk to get around traffic?" Input: This sidewalk needed to be wide enough as well as accessible for a moving vehicle to drive on it because there is a big gap between road and sidewalk, and the author's statement would be impossible to do so since there is no such a sidewalk in Iran.
2.This author on page 55 alleged that "in October 2000, Ayatollah Khamenei, Ayatollah Khomeini's successor as supreme leader-the only real executive power in Iran-made it clear what the victory in Lebanon meant for Iran. It was during a secret address to Iran's National Security Council. After the usual long preamble, larded with quotations from the Koran, Khamenei put both hands on the conference table." Input: Since he is an intelligent officer, he is required due to nature of his work to be detail orient, and should know that Khamenei's right hand is immobile. As a result, there are cloud of doubts looming on the book as how truthful is this author with his readers.
This author contradicts himself on major points as follow.
1.This author on page 10 asserted that "and it wasn't as if the Iranian government could not close down the opium dens if it wanted to. Iran is a police state. Every day I drove around Tehran, or walked around the streets and bazaars, I was stopped and my papers checked." On page 77 this author claimed that "Iran is not a totalitarian state run by "Islamofascists" who believe they're in some quixotic war with the West." Input: Police state and totalitarian state shared same meaning as a state controls every fabric of a society, as this author experienced in Iran under rule of the mullah in Iran.
2.This author on page 207 claimed that "since 9/11, without any evidence, these people have tried to make the case that Muslims intend to infiltrate the United States, bring down from inside, and convert us to Islam." On page 230-231 this author was talking with Muhammad British-Pakistani born who made a remark about 7/7 which was the way to go and "accept Allah's law," he said. "End of story. Accept Allah's law and I think you'll have a peaceful life." In other words, we either convert to Islam or die." Input: There is a reality that Muslims are planning to convert Western nations to Islam or they have to die.
Author's theory frame work for the cleric regime in Iran:
1.This author was working on theory of green belt or green crescent which was orchestra by former democrat president Jimmy Carter to contain communism in the region. As this author claimed that the cleric regime in Iran has infiltrated in Afghanistan, Lebanon, Palestine and Iraq and the regime in Iran was in charge of the situation in the region. Also, Turkey was under spill of the regime too but not as strongly as other region. As a result, the cleric regime in Iran is a superpower. This author lacked understanding the term superpower which means a state is in leading position in the international system and has ability to influence on international events. Current regime in Iran is not able to control international event, and has been struggling about its nuclear programs. The regime in Iran is not a great power either which would have economic, military, diplomatic and cultural strength. The current regime in Iran is a rouge state, which is an authoritarian regime, absent of human rights, and seeking weapon of mass destruction.
2.This author was claiming that the regime in Iran is no longer relying on terrorism to advance its interest. However, the cleric regime has been targeting Iranian dissidents and have been murdering them around the world.
3.This author on page 15 claimed that the US do not understand the regime in Iran because of Iranian dissidents are lobbying the White House and the White House does not have clear understanding of Iran. According to the record, so far element of the cleric regime on individual base or as a council like National Iranian American Council had opportunity to meet senior staffs and elected politicians, and to mislead the White House and not Iranian dissidents.
4.This author is working on fear tactic that price of oil on rise and on page 198 this author says it is in best interest of the US to negotiate with the regime in Iran. However, he does not provide any information or strategy how to negotiate with the regime in Iran.
Author was bias toward Iran:
1.On page 9, this author claimed that there was no moral police officers in Iran. However, the regime has moral police officers who are enforcing Islamic dress code in Iran
2.This author on page 55 alleged that "in October 2000, Ayatollah Khamenei, Ayatollah Khomeini's successor as supreme leader-the only real executive power in Iran-made it clear what the victory in Lebanon meant for Iran. It was during a secret address to Iran's National Security Council. After the usual long preamble, larded with quotations from the Koran, Khamenei put both hands on the conference table." Input: Since he is an intelligent officer, he is required due to nature of his work to be detail orient, and should know that Khamenei's right hand is immobile. As a result, there are cloud of doubts looming on the book as how truthful is this author with his readers.
This author contradicts himself on major points as follow.
1.This author on page 10 asserted that "and it wasn't as if the Iranian government could not close down the opium dens if it wanted to. Iran is a police state. Every day I drove around Tehran, or walked around the streets and bazaars, I was stopped and my papers checked." On page 77 this author claimed that "Iran is not a totalitarian state run by "Islamofascists" who believe they're in some quixotic war with the West." Input: Police state and totalitarian state shared same meaning as a state controls every fabric of a society, as this author experienced in Iran under rule of the mullah in Iran.
2.This author on page 207 claimed that "since 9/11, without any evidence, these people have tried to make the case that Muslims intend to infiltrate the United States, bring down from inside, and convert us to Islam." On page 230-231 this author was talking with Muhammad British-Pakistani born who made a remark about 7/7 which was the way to go and "accept Allah's law," he said. "End of story. Accept Allah's law and I think you'll have a peaceful life." In other words, we either convert to Islam or die." Input: There is a reality that Muslims are planning to convert Western nations to Islam or they have to die.
Author's theory frame work for the cleric regime in Iran:
1.This author was working on theory of green belt or green crescent which was orchestra by former democrat president Jimmy Carter to contain communism in the region. As this author claimed that the cleric regime in Iran has infiltrated in Afghanistan, Lebanon, Palestine and Iraq and the regime in Iran was in charge of the situation in the region. Also, Turkey was under spill of the regime too but not as strongly as other region. As a result, the cleric regime in Iran is a superpower. This author lacked understanding the term superpower which means a state is in leading position in the international system and has ability to influence on international events. Current regime in Iran is not able to control international event, and has been struggling about its nuclear programs. The regime in Iran is not a great power either which would have economic, military, diplomatic and cultural strength. The current regime in Iran is a rouge state, which is an authoritarian regime, absent of human rights, and seeking weapon of mass destruction.
2.This author was claiming that the regime in Iran is no longer relying on terrorism to advance its interest. However, the cleric regime has been targeting Iranian dissidents and have been murdering them around the world.
3.This author on page 15 claimed that the US do not understand the regime in Iran because of Iranian dissidents are lobbying the White House and the White House does not have clear understanding of Iran. According to the record, so far element of the cleric regime on individual base or as a council like National Iranian American Council had opportunity to meet senior staffs and elected politicians, and to mislead the White House and not Iranian dissidents.
4.This author is working on fear tactic that price of oil on rise and on page 198 this author says it is in best interest of the US to negotiate with the regime in Iran. However, he does not provide any information or strategy how to negotiate with the regime in Iran.
Author was bias toward Iran:
1.On page 9, this author claimed that there was no moral police officers in Iran. However, the regime has moral police officers who are enforcing Islamic dress code in Iran
Our Man In Tehran by Robert Wright
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFO4RuL-KYU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33o9U7DtEy8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwWCS88UfG8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl9_t3UjetM
1.
On page 8 this author stated the shah had indeed married the girl, Gilda Soufi... Ottawa obliged. Not even the KGB knew that the shah had taken a fourth wife." According to historical fact, King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI married three times, and at each time of his marriage, there was monogamy relationship. Thus, this author's claim that the King was involved in a polygamy relationship was false. In addition, this author was reverberating the theocratic regime's propaganda in Iran that the King had a mistress. After careful consideration, this author left a taste that he has a connection with the regime in Iran.
2.
On page 17, this author put a great leverage on 1953 coup which was orchestrated by the US. According to CIA documents, it did not take part in 1953 coup in Iran, the below weblink would shed lights on 1953 coup in Iran.
3.
http://iranzamin2529.blogspot.com/2009/04/1953-coup-detat-in-iran.html
4.
On page 21, this author mentioned that the King called himself, King of Kings or Shahanshah, Light of Aryan. As a matter of fact, it was part of Iran's political culture to refer to all Iranian/Persian monarchs as King of Kings. The Light of Aryan title was given to Him by academic arena. The King also had another title, Great Chief and Commander of of Imperial Army.
5.
On several pages, this author mentioned that SAVAK agents had torture machines in their homes. The above allegation emerged on the surface after victory of 1979 Revolution in Iran. After careful consideration, the above allegation had no merit. First, victims would be in pain and would be making loud noises, so neighbors would know that there were problems. Last, this author claimed that there were victims body parts. Obviously, these places would cause staunch. Currently, there are SAVAK agents all over the world, and none ever brought international courts.
6.
This author mentioned several times about armories were present in the streets. Indeed, in 1970's, Quebec wanted to separate from rest of Canada, and there were individuals that they engaged in terrorist activities. There were marshal laws in place, and absent of civil liberty. Of course, in the above case, the end justify the meaning. However, in case of Pahlavi, it would be constituted as brutality.
7.
On page 50, this author needed to read General Robert Huyser's book " Mission to Tehran" that how he prevented the Imperial Iranian Armed Forces to stage a coup in Iran. In addition, he was puzzled why Carter's administration was forcing General Toufanian to buy more weapons from the US.
8.
This author illustrated bias toward 1979 revolution by calling former Generals with derogatory names while this author was praising the revolutionary people.
9.
This author had no firm grasp of Iran's 1979 Revolution because he was referring to King Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as Reza Pahlavi.
10.
There were plenty of grammar mistakes.
11.
This author also invented his own version of history by claiming that Khomeini's sons, Ahmad and Mustafa were well trained in military skills. In fact, Ahmad, and Mustafa were pleasently plum, and Mustafa died as a result of over eating.
12.
The bottom line, this book reminder of BBC propaganda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33o9U7DtEy8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwWCS88UfG8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl9_t3UjetM
1.
On page 8 this author stated the shah had indeed married the girl, Gilda Soufi... Ottawa obliged. Not even the KGB knew that the shah had taken a fourth wife." According to historical fact, King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI married three times, and at each time of his marriage, there was monogamy relationship. Thus, this author's claim that the King was involved in a polygamy relationship was false. In addition, this author was reverberating the theocratic regime's propaganda in Iran that the King had a mistress. After careful consideration, this author left a taste that he has a connection with the regime in Iran.
2.
On page 17, this author put a great leverage on 1953 coup which was orchestrated by the US. According to CIA documents, it did not take part in 1953 coup in Iran, the below weblink would shed lights on 1953 coup in Iran.
3.
http://iranzamin2529.blogspot.com/2009/04/1953-coup-detat-in-iran.html
4.
On page 21, this author mentioned that the King called himself, King of Kings or Shahanshah, Light of Aryan. As a matter of fact, it was part of Iran's political culture to refer to all Iranian/Persian monarchs as King of Kings. The Light of Aryan title was given to Him by academic arena. The King also had another title, Great Chief and Commander of of Imperial Army.
5.
On several pages, this author mentioned that SAVAK agents had torture machines in their homes. The above allegation emerged on the surface after victory of 1979 Revolution in Iran. After careful consideration, the above allegation had no merit. First, victims would be in pain and would be making loud noises, so neighbors would know that there were problems. Last, this author claimed that there were victims body parts. Obviously, these places would cause staunch. Currently, there are SAVAK agents all over the world, and none ever brought international courts.
6.
This author mentioned several times about armories were present in the streets. Indeed, in 1970's, Quebec wanted to separate from rest of Canada, and there were individuals that they engaged in terrorist activities. There were marshal laws in place, and absent of civil liberty. Of course, in the above case, the end justify the meaning. However, in case of Pahlavi, it would be constituted as brutality.
7.
On page 50, this author needed to read General Robert Huyser's book " Mission to Tehran" that how he prevented the Imperial Iranian Armed Forces to stage a coup in Iran. In addition, he was puzzled why Carter's administration was forcing General Toufanian to buy more weapons from the US.
8.
This author illustrated bias toward 1979 revolution by calling former Generals with derogatory names while this author was praising the revolutionary people.
9.
This author had no firm grasp of Iran's 1979 Revolution because he was referring to King Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as Reza Pahlavi.
10.
There were plenty of grammar mistakes.
11.
This author also invented his own version of history by claiming that Khomeini's sons, Ahmad and Mustafa were well trained in military skills. In fact, Ahmad, and Mustafa were pleasently plum, and Mustafa died as a result of over eating.
12.
The bottom line, this book reminder of BBC propaganda
Where This World Affair is Heading
It is since January 2011 that the world is witnessing a global chaos. The US pretends that it is not involved, but it is involved. The US is not seeking global stability but global chaos because the US is selling weapons to the nations.
Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi-Blue Eyes People
In this video clip, Hi Imperial Majesty, King of Kings Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI clearly stated that the Western world needed to wake-up, and start being responsible for their action with regard to consumption of fossil fuel. The free ride of fossil fuel had come to an end. In addition, His Imperial Majesty, in His book "Answer to History" predicated that the West would pay more than $75.00 US per barrel.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
US hands in Egypt
It was very puzzling that the US was pursuing policy of regime change in Egypt, and all of sudden it made sense when the TIME magazine mentioned Honsi MUBARAK received his military training in Russia. The article left an impression that since Russia was nemeses of the US, it made Mr. MUBARAK unreliable allied to the US. The article mentioned that after Camp David, 1979 treaty, Egypt was sending recent recruit officers to the US for military training which made them more flexible in regard treating civilians. This portion of the article sent another shock wave that Imperial Iranian Armed Forces during reign of monarchy were trained in the US, and this magazine was cheering for their execution in 1979.
It became clear after reading the Economist, and the TIME magazines that the only reason Egyptian officers did not open fire at demonstrators because they were trained in the US. It was possible that these officers were loyal to the US. In addition, there was a person with name of Wisner who was consulting MUBARAK on foreign and domestic politics and he too like past time of Iran, pushing agenda of human rights with Mubarak. Thus, the US decided to appoint someone in Egypt that s/he would be allied of the US without any kind of Marxist history. Furthermore, the US is using the moment to transform the African nations by eradicating Russia's allies, and establishing the US friends in order to control the region.
Perhaps, the above events explained why Prince Ali Reza PAHLAVI had to die so Crown Prince Reza PAHLAVI would know that He was not allow to emancipate Iran.
It became clear after reading the Economist, and the TIME magazines that the only reason Egyptian officers did not open fire at demonstrators because they were trained in the US. It was possible that these officers were loyal to the US. In addition, there was a person with name of Wisner who was consulting MUBARAK on foreign and domestic politics and he too like past time of Iran, pushing agenda of human rights with Mubarak. Thus, the US decided to appoint someone in Egypt that s/he would be allied of the US without any kind of Marxist history. Furthermore, the US is using the moment to transform the African nations by eradicating Russia's allies, and establishing the US friends in order to control the region.
Perhaps, the above events explained why Prince Ali Reza PAHLAVI had to die so Crown Prince Reza PAHLAVI would know that He was not allow to emancipate Iran.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Do not Cry for Iran
The recent events in Africa which took place in Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia, it sent a shock wave to the regime in Iran that it was at mercy of its people. Once, again, the rouge state in Iran relied on its puppets like Khatami to act as a wise voice for public's frustration. In fact, the state in Iran has all intention to show everyone that who was the boss, and was in-charge of the country. On Monday Feb 14th, 2011 Sanea Jaleh, a 26-year-old was killed by security forces in Iran. Of course, the security forces in Iran are not Iranians, they are from other region of the world that mullahs brought in Iran to suppress Iranians.
Lying is a huge industry in Iran, and the mullahs with their associates like Revolutionary Guards, Besij, and plain clothes are good at lying.
I hope, one day, Iranians would wake-up and realize by following mullahs whether he is wearing a green turban, or white turban, or anything associated with the regime in Iran is not a solution for their problems, but total removal of the rouge IRI was the only key to a better future for everyone. Obvious, the regime will come down with heavy hand on people, and only option is a military intervention to topple the regime in Iran.
Lying is a huge industry in Iran, and the mullahs with their associates like Revolutionary Guards, Besij, and plain clothes are good at lying.
I hope, one day, Iranians would wake-up and realize by following mullahs whether he is wearing a green turban, or white turban, or anything associated with the regime in Iran is not a solution for their problems, but total removal of the rouge IRI was the only key to a better future for everyone. Obvious, the regime will come down with heavy hand on people, and only option is a military intervention to topple the regime in Iran.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)