SECURITY COUNCIL REFORM

This paper seeks to illustrate key findings regarding the position taken by the Eastern European group toward the benefits of Security Council reform. A brief history of how the United Nations was established and the foundations of the Security Council are touched upon as well as the criticisms concerning its functions. The main objective and key arguments of the Eastern European group regarding its position for reform are analysed to demonstrate a better understanding and reasoning behind the group’s position concerning reform.

The United Nations is an international organization that aims to aid support in international law, international security, economic development, social progress, human rights, and to ultimately achieve world peace. The United Nations was established in 1945 after World War II. The purpose of the UN was to replace the League of Nations to stop wars between countries and provide platform for discussion. The League of Nations was founded in 1919, during the First World War and promoted peace, security and international cooperation. However, the United Nations came about because the League of Nations failed to prevent the Second World War (History of the United Nations, 2012). The United Nations currently has 193 member states and consists of six principle organs being, the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council, the Secretariat, the International Court of Justice and the United Nations Trustee Council (History of the United Nations, 2012). Under the United Nations Charter the Security Council has the primary responsibility of maintaining international peace and security (Charter of the United Nations, 2012).

The Security Council has 15 members, 5 of which are permanent and hold veto power and 10 of which are elected members. The 5 permanent members include China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US). Currently the 10 elected members include Azerbaijan, Columbia, Germany, Guatemala, India, Morocco, Pakistan, Portugal, South Africa and Togo (United Nations Security Council, 2012). When there is a complaint from any member state concerning a threat to peace the Security Council’s first step is to recommend a peaceful resolution. However, once that threat leads to fighting the Security Council’s first objective is to bring it to end by various means such as issuing cease-fire directives, deciding on enforcement measures, sending United Nations peace-keeping forces, economic sanctions such as trade, military action against a UN member state or the suspension of membership or dismissal from the General Assembly of a UN member state (United Nations Security Council, 2012). However, it has been recommended to reform the Security Council regarding its members.

It has been criticized that the five permanent members of the Security Council are primarily concerned with their strategic interests and political motives. China, France, Russia, the UK and the US are all nuclear powers and through their self-interests have been alleged to have created their own “nuclear club” and since 80% of the permanent members are for the most part white western nations, they can be seen to be functioning on a global apartheid (Titus Alexander). Another criticism of concern involving the Security Council is their power to “veto”. The power to veto was established after world war II and gives the five permanent members of the security council the power to strike down any proposal by a single “no” vote. The veto power has allowed these nations to strike down any measures that may oppose to their distinct national interests (Council on Foreign Relations, 2012). Permanent members of the council have used this veto power sparingly when it concerns their own interests and this poses as a problem because it allows for their nation to always be on a hierarchy of priority which does not establish equality amongst all nations (Council on Foreign Relations, 2006). The recommendation to reform the Security Council concerns itself with reforming the membership. Its proposal includes increasing the amount of permanent members in the council (Council of Foreign Relations, 2012). The most popular demand for an increase in permanent members has been from Brazil, India, Germany, Japan, one African nation and one nation from the Arab league. Although some of these members are the largest funders of the UN and have the most UN peace keeping troops, their proposals for reform have been reluctantly supported as well as some firmly opposed by the current five permanent members of the Security Council.

As mentioned above, the United Nations has 193 member states. All 193 are together all unofficially divided into five geopolitical regional groups. The five groups include the African group, the Asia-Pacific group, the Eastern European group, the Latin American and Caribbean group and the Western European and Other group. The Eastern European Group (EEG) consists of countries from Eastern Europe and Caucasus, composing of 23 state actors. The EEG has only one seat in the General Assembly (one of the principle organs in which all members are supposed to have equal representation) while other regions have two or more seats which enable them to have more clout in issues pertaining to international relations. The Eastern European group has had a long history of conflict with Western European nations concerning differences in ideology which makes it difficult for the EEG to seek consensus with the Western European group over some issues which deems to be of importance due to the close geographical proximities between the two groups. The Eastern European nations are not wealthy, and are prone to falling behind on their UN membership payments. Since the Warsaw Pact no longer exists it also makes it difficult for the EEG to have strong military presence for peacekeeping efforts and reliance on allies. All these issues added to the result of weakness within the group.

However, in 1946 there was a change in the status quo; the Eastern European seat was included in the permanent members under the “gentlemen’s agreement” (Security Council Report, 2012). The agreement did not sit well with the Soviet Union and the West and for twenty years they contested and strived to place their preferred candidates in this seat. It also became a fiercely contested seat among new member states that did not have a clear regional grouping (Security Council Report, 2012).

The EEG not being a member of the five permanent members of the Security Council do not hold veto power which remains an obstacle to reform the Security Council as these five members would not want to relinquish their right to veto (The Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2012). All state actors would act on premise of raisons d’état, to promote and gain their own interest (The Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2012).

As previously discussed, the Security Council’s primary function is to make binding decisions in order to maintain international peace and security. Therefore it would lead one to believe that equal and proportional representation should be achieved by the members of the UN. The last Security Council enlargement was in 1965, though it added 4 new non-permanent seats, it still is controlled by the 5 global powers after WWII and since then new world powers have come forward (Center for UN Reform Education, 2007).

As previously mentioned, Russia (formerly the USSR), is a member of the Eastern European group (EEG) and also a permanent member of the Security Council. So it could be argued that the eastern European group currently has large enough representation and a veto on the Security Council. However most of the other 22 member states of the EEG were formerly under Russian control and have since split off from Russia. So therefore it can be asked does Russia actually have the best interest of these member states in mind when it makes Security Council decisions. The EEG is the smallest of the regional groups but has seen the most growth in recent years, which could be attributed primarily to member states gaining their independence from Russia.

The EEG members would like to see Security Council reform, expansion, and more transparency. Romania for example has pointed out that it has been decades since the last expansion of the Security Council and how it is going to be decades since they (UN) started discussing this issue (“Statement By H.E. Mr. Mihnea Motoc”, 2007). Slovenia has pointed out that Security Council reform has been needed since the cold war both in its methods and composition. There needs to be more permanent member’s added, as well as more frequent rotation of the non-permanent members (Slovenian Statement on Security Council Reform, 2009). Bulgaria takes a similar stance to Slovenia, but it also points out that since the EEG has grown the most, membership wise, in recent years the EEG should receive another non-permanent seat on the Security Council (Bulgaria Statement at the General Assembly Debate on Security Council Reform, 2007). During the same general assembly debate in 2007, Estonia supports Bulgaria in the sense that the EEG needs another non-permanent seat, and permanent seats need to be added as well in order to achieve equitable geographical representation (Estonia Statement at the General Assembly Debate on Security Council Reform, 2007).

In conclusion, the Eastern European group has seen rapid membership expansion in recent years due to many states gaining independence from Russia. Therefore it can be argued that Russia should no longer be making the decisions on behalf of the entire EEG and that the current one non-permanent EEG seat is not sufficient due to their geographical size and membership. The addition of another non-permanent seat on the Security Council would help provide better representation as well as regional equitability. The United Nations has been discussing the issue of Security Council reform for almost a decade now and we have yet to see any major alterations to the balance of power which was created during the cold war era.

References

History of the United Nations. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/aboutun/history/1941-1950.shtml

Charter of the United Nations. (2012). Retrieved from
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/

United Nations Security Council. (2012). Retrieved from
http://www.un.org/en/sc/members/

Council on Foreign Relations. (2006). Retrieved from
http://www.cfr.org/un/effectiveness-un-security-council/p11520

Center for UN Reform Education. (2007). The United Nations Security Council: Reforms concerning its membership - An Overview. Retrieved from www.centerforunreform.org/system/files/Overview+(2007).pdf

“Statement By H.E. Mr. Mihnea Motoc”. (2007, November 13). Retrieved from

http://www.reformtheun.org/index.php?option=com_docman&gid=15&category=10&orderby=dmdate_published&ascdesc=DESC&Itemid=248&limitstart=180

Slovenian Statement on Security Council Reform. (2009, March 4). Retrieved from http://www.reformtheun.org/index.php?option=com_docman&gid=15&category=10&orderby=dmdate_published&ascdesc=DESC&Itemid=248&limitstart=120

Bulgaria Statement at the General Assembly Debate on Security Council Reform. (2007, November 13). Retrieved from http://www.reformtheun.org/index.php?option=com_docman&gid=15&category=10&orderby=dmdate_published&ascdesc=DESC&Itemid=248&limitstart=180

Estonia Statement at the General Assembly Debate on Security Council Reform. (2007, November 13). Retrieved from http://www.reformtheun.org/index.php?option=com_docman&gid=15&category=10&orderby=dmdate_published&ascdesc=DESC&Itemid=248&limitstart=180

Security Council Report. (23 September 2012) Retrieved from http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/special-research-report/lookup-c-glKWLeMTIsG-b

The Center for Strategic and International Studies. (23 September 2012). Retrieved from http://csis.org/files/publication/twq03autumnweiss.pdf

Former SAVAK Agent Parviz SABETI

Mr. Parviz SABETI was a former SAVAK agent during times of Pahlavi Reign. Mr. SABETI hold high position in the SAVAK who was responsible, as well as, accountable for national sovereignty of Iran against domestic and foreign enemies.

There were elements in Iran who publicly in YouTube were saying that they were involved in assassination of prominent individuals. Their primary intention were sedition of the Pahlavi Reign. Thereby, their act would be deemed as criminal which was duty of the Pahlavi Regime to enforce social order in Iran and to prevent social chaos in Iran.

Ask yourself as a rational person and not as a person who wants to reject or just praise someone. What should SAVAK do when these elements were engaging in act of social disorder? What should Mr. SABETI do when these elements were committing criminal offences against law?

Obviously, SAVAK and Mr. SABETI had sworn to up-hold the law, and protect and defend Iran's national sovereignty. If Mr. SABETI was in some other country, leaders would deem him as an honorable man and would give hih a medal.

The above statement is valid as long as there is no evidence that he was working with the regime in Iran and so on...

Israel vs the rouge state in Iran

Israel decided to halt its preemptive military strike on the nuclear sites in Iran, and hoping the economic sanctions would deter the regime in Iran to continue its nuclear proliferation. In addition, currently, Iran's currency has lost its value. Right now, Iran's currency is just a piece of paper with countless zero on it.

When Western Politicians Work With Terrorists

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R3BD7yjcEE&feature=relmfu
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mp4a03aBig&feature=player_embedded

Thou Shalt not Steal

There is one Christian Commandment which is against stealing from people, it is thou shall not steal. It is a grand idea that someone needs to remember it. 

When North African countries were going through regime change, Canadian government was freezing assets of  head of states of the North African countries, and would label them as a dictator. There was a question that if these head of states were dictators. Than, why did you let them have assets in Canada?  And now who possess those assets? 

Currently, there is no evidence which proves any assets is being transferred to people. There is a natural conclusion that these assets are owned by elite members of Canada, and there was a good Christian doctrine thou shall not steal.

The West is Bullying Muslims over Muhammad

The Western nations know that Muslim people are sensitive about Prophet Muhammad, and the Wester nations are using freedom of speech as scapegoat to insult Prophet Muhammad. The Muslim people begin by reacting with burning, and killing non-Muslims.

Than, there is the fake surprise face of the Western people that Muslims are uncivilized and there is no freedom of speech in the Muslim nations. Now, looking at other side of the coin, Muslim people do not disrespect Jesus or making any comment to Jesus which may offend Christian community. Yes, Muslims do attack at Christian communities, when Christians in the West start disrespecting their faith. The real question is why these Western nations are making cartoon and movies which are depicting Muhammad as a pervert or a bi/homosexual man? If someone in a movie theater begins to shout fire would authority apprehend her/him for an offence of mischief? Will authority in an airport apprehend a person who says bomb?

As a result, the social order of a society is more important than freedom of speech. Particularly, the Muslim nations are not doing anything against Jesus, it is the West which is agitating the Muslim community and it is acting as a bully against Muslims.

Let think independently, let not become pawn of politicians for their own bloodbath desire. Let live in peace with one another.

Military Strike On Nuclear Sites is Not An Option

The international community is disappointed with regard to the regime's nuclear program. There are some countries that they are contemplating to launch military strike on the nuclear sites in Iran. These countries are not violating any law. As a matter of fact, these countries are acting within United Nations Article 51 “Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.”¹ There are some other countries like Germany that it would like to impose more economic sanction against the regime in Iran and to resolve this nuclear issue base on dialogue of nations. It is following Peace Treaty of Westphalia.

Assuming one country like Israel to follow Article 51 of the United Nations, and launch a preemptive strike on nuclear sites of Iran. The above action would not secure existing of Israel and it would endanger existing of Israel. The regime in Iran would mobilize itself within several years and would launch terrorist strike on Israel and US interest around the world to ensure its security. If the nuclear blast would be a bad news for the world, the terrorist attacks against Israel and US would be way worst than the nuclear blast.

As a result, a preemptive military strike on the nuclear site in Iran would be fruitless. However, there is an alternative in ending in nuclear saga of Iran. Massive military deployment in Iran to topple the regime in Iran, as it happened in 2003, when US launched a military assault on Saddam Huyssien, and ended Saddam's regime. Last part, it would be the same tactic which is using now. Assisting dissidents within Iran to demolish the Islamic Republic of Iran.

1United Nations <http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter7.shtml> 21 Sept 2012

Pandora Box of Iran's Nuclear Proliferation

On July 01^st, 1968 the former establishment of Iran which was a monarchy system and head of state was Shah Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Recently, The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has brought it to the light that the regime in Iran's nuclear proliferation was in violation of the NPT.¹ Iran's nuclear energy head Mr. Fereydoun ABBASI-DAVANI (Douani) فریدون عباسی دوانی refuted the IAEA's claim, and charged the above agency being infiltrated by terrorist and saboteurs.²

 

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin NETANYAHU expressed serious concern with regard to the Iran's nuclear proliferation because it has direct impact on the state of Israel's survival in the region. Mr. Netanyahu has been persistent to use of military strike on Iran.³ However, German Chancellor Angela Merkel does not share same philosophy as Netanyahu, and believes in a political solution over the nuclear programs in Iran.⁴

The regime in Iran will not stop its nuclear proliferation, and learned a valuable lesson from former Libya president Qaddafi that by giving-up on nuclear proliferation, there was great possibility in this political realism to be overthrowing by foreign states. The regime in Iran has been very candid about its involvement in Syria. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corp General Mohammad Ali JAFARI who suppress uprising back in 2009 in Iran, he was assigned to provide advise to the regime in Syria to suppress the political unrest in the Syria.⁵

The bottom line, the nuclear programs in Iran is a means of survival, and any attack on the nuclear programs in Iran, it will be translated in a massive terrorist attack around the world against interest of the NATO or US and Israel Allies. The regime in Iran needs Shia state in Syria as an instrument to dominate the region, and would not allow the Syrian state to be overthrowing by the Western nations. Thus,  the political climate in the Middle East is moving toward political realism each day, and the region is becoming less stable for any peaceful means to create political liberalism in the region.

1National Post <http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/09/18/iaea-ignores-iranian-claim-it-has-been-infiltrated-by-terrorists-presses-islamic-republic-on-alleged-bomb-research/> 18 Sept 2012

2National Post <http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/09/18/iaea-ignores-iranian-claim-it-has-been-infiltrated-by-terrorists-presses-islamic-republic-on-alleged-bomb-research/> 18 Sept 2012

3The Gazette <http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Irans+nuke+chief+speak+155nation+atomic+agency+meet+Tehrans+atomic/7252131/story.html> 18 Sept 2012

4The Gazette <http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Irans+nuke+chief+speak+155nation+atomic+agency+meet+Tehrans+atomic/7252131/story.html> 18 Sept 2012

5The Wall Street <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443720204578000482831419570.html?mod=googlenews_wsj> 18 Sept 2012

Muhammad full movie - Innocence of Muslims

From Tehran to Cairo / از تهران تا قاهره

White Revolution or Socialism of King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI

In 1963, His Imperial Majesty, King of Kings Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI executed White Revolution in Iran. He was planning to modernize Iran, and key elements of His Revolution were lean toward socialism. For example, factories were sharing profit with workers was a revolutionary idea. Karl Marx deemed profit as unpaid labor, and now owner of means of production was sharing profit with proletarians. Or taking lands from feudal lords and distrubting the lands among serfs and His Majesty transformed serf into land owners.

It is not about past, but understanding the new Iran, needs new thinking, and new path to emancipate Iran from hands of burtality of Islamic Republic of Iran.

کودتای نوژه: سی و دو سال بعد/ Nojeh, or Nozheh Coup

After watching the above video clip, still, I could not believe that there are indviduals that they think the West and the East were staging a coup to overthrow the regime in Iran. In fact, the regime in Iran is puppet and slave of the West.

A coup is not a party so everyone would be involve in it. It is secret, it is an act of sedition which carries a death sentence regardless which country a group of people would engage mutiny.

It was also questionable Dr. MILANI was associating word democrat with democracy. If anyone wants to know meaning of democracy, s/he need to read Thomas Hobbs and other political thinkers to understand what what democracy means.

Dr. MILANI is not sole person that needs our disregard, just going to the bottom of this petite pit of misery of Iran would be some low life person like Shirin NESHAT who is a chef and is a political leader and does not know what politics means. Just by scoping in her life, it is obvious that she is trying to benefit herself.

Today, there is a claim that the Nozheh Coup was rooted in the US, Saddam Hussein, or East so people would distrust Iran's Army.

The bottom line, there are no friends among us, we are sorround by enemies, even there are enemies within us. Let's burn the past, and not following anyone but to lead forward like a sharp sword, and only relying within us and to breath life of warrior in us so that one day Iran will be emancipated from hands of tyrannt.

هرگز نخواب کوروشCyrus do not sleep/2500 Celebration of Monarchy in Iran

This is one example that how Iranians ruined their own chance for glorfying Iran so that today they would not be stranded in a strange nations.

What really go down? Was it foriegn elements that they plant seeds of hate against head of state? Or was it that we were naive?

We were naive for believing in others, and thinking for a moment that they were our allied. We need to understand that we have no friends and we are left to our own devices to emanicipate Iran from hands of tyrannt.

The Immortals Persian

Accurate and detailed information about the Persian Immortals of the Achaemenid Persian Empire and the Sassanian Immortals known as the Savaran Heavy Cataphracts. This will be an ongoing project to develop proper information and historical account of the Pre-Islamic Persian World.
http://www.radpour.com/home

Iran's Flag-Sword

There is always a talk that the Scimitar Sword in Iran's flag is an Arabic sword. However, it is not. It is an Iranian sword. There is a curve in it because when it slashes a human, it won't lodge in a body. In case, it is a straight sword, it is very likely to lodge in a human body. The below sword is sharp on one side.



Now, looking at the Saudi Arabia's sword which is a straight sword, and cannot be claim that Iranian sword is always straight. The above sword is way suprior to the below sword, particularly, when calvary is rushing forward to break through the defence of the enemy. Sharp strike is the key point to win a battle. The below sword is sharp on two sides.

Iranians used Kopis swords too which was used by infantry to charge at enemies front line. The Kopis sword is heavy to carry and fight, but it is an effective sword to break spear, body armour, and chop bones.

Women of Persia: Persian Female Warriors

Women of Persia: Persian Female Warriors

Dark Secrets : Inside Bohemian Grove Full Length

After watching the above video, I realized how the US is toying with idea of democracy and freedom with people who are suffering from their tyrannical regimes. For example, the current establishment in Iran was installed by former US president Jimmy Carter because he deemed the Pahlavi Dynasty was violating human rights. Thus, the regime changed in Iran, and someone needs to ask this question is the current regime treating people within guidline of human rights? No. Shame on these Satanic people for their diabolic plan for Iran.

Will Bashar Al-Assad Survive?

There is a pending question now that will Bashar Al-Assad supress the unrest in his country and begin to rule his country in a climate that he would like.

Obviously, not because the Western power want him to overthrow him from power and the regime in Iran is trying to hold on him because it is a valuable ally to the regime in Iran.

The bottom line, the regime in Iran will be overthrow at some point in future, and the regime in Iran will be left with Russia to stop regime change in Iran.

It will be a very interesting event to follow.

The Stoning of Soraya M.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q58nLi5eA-I
Jimmy Carter gets Noble Peace Prize for destroying people's life. He is the man who besmirched the King (Shah) for human rights violation. Is this human right in Iran now?

Marmoulak Full Movie (ENGLISH SUBTITLES) |

The Hidden Half (Nimeh-ye penhan نيمه پنهان) Full movie & English subs

Vakonesh Panjom - فیلم واکنش پنجم

Americans Brought Upon Themselves-9/11

We all heard the statement that Americans brought 9/11 upon themselves because they were interfering with domestic affairs of other nations. However, those 3000 people who died in the twin towers had nothing to do with foreign affairs of the US. Even, there is a possibility that there was a person who did not align his views with US's foreign policy, and now that person's family would not be any supporter of nations who are in need of support. Consequently, those individuals who are using the title of this entry, they are warmongers and justifying their hostile attitudes toward civilians.

Iran makes arrests in scientist’s assassination: speaker

TEHRAN — Iran has made arrests over a scientist’s assassination last week blamed on Israel and the U.S., parliament speaker Ali Larijani said Monday, vowing his country would avenge the death using “non-terrorist” tactics.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/01/16/iran-makes-arrests-in-scientists-assassination-speaker/

What does Pahlevi Mean?

“This Pehlevi is simply the old name for the Persian language, and there can be little doubt that Pehlevi, which is the Persian name for what is ancient was derived from Pahlav, a hero warrior, which pahlav again is a regular modification of parthav, the name of the Parthians who were the rulers pf Persia for nearly fiver hundred years.
F. Max Muller “Theosophy or Psychological Religion” Cambridge University Press. Page 36.

Why Did Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI Leave Iran?

In 1979, King (Shah) Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI left Iran, and He said to reporters that He was leaving Iran because He did not want anymore bloodshed in His beloved country. Now, it does make sense what He was telling us. Just rewind clock of history in Iran, it was during World War II, Russia and England invaded Iran, even Iran declared itself a neutral country, Russia and England careless about Iran's position, and invaded Iran, and began to plundering Iran's oil for their war machinery. King Reza PAHLAVI abdicated from His Throne because Russia and England did resented King Reza PAHLAVI due to His modernization plan for Iran, making Iran a nation-state, as He moved Iran from a conservative base on religion (theology) state and society to a rational and a secular state.

The above superpowers and other ones were thinking that by allowing young princes Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI to ascend to throne, it would be easy to manipulate Him, as well as, preventing Iran from progress. However, the Western powers were wrong, King Reza PAHLAVI continued with His version of modernization of Iran, as it became glorified during celebration of 2500 ceremony in Iran, and Iran indeed moved from a conservative wisdom to a norm and liberal minded society.

The Western power like England, France, and US were not please with King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI's agenda for Iran. It was during Jimmy CARTER's presidency as he ignited fire in Iran, and besmirched the legal system in Iran to be in violation of human rights. The legal system improved its standard in order to meet Red Cross, as well as, the united Nations recommendation. However, the US did not stop interfering in Iran's domestic affairs, CARTER continually pushing agenda of human rights in Iran. King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI left Iran in peace.

Now, looking at North Africa and, particularly, Gaddafi's incident as NATO special forces were roaming around the Libya to topple the regime in Libya it would happened in Iran. Consequently, King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI left Iran in order to stop the bloodshed. Otherwise, the US would launch massive air and ground attack on Iran under elusive banner of freedom for Iran.

Thanks God that King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI was a savvy person, and He did not have ego but a rational mind to save His country from further bloodshed. His Soul Always be Happy in Paradise.

THE GOLDEN VEIL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs10O7FFYD8

Judas Lady Gaga

http://www.vevo.com/watch/lady-gaga/judas/USUV71100566

Decoding Emblem of Islamic Republic of Iran

In 1979, the Pahlavi Dynasty collapsed and it was replaced by theology state of Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI). The new establishment claimed that Iran's flag which had lion and sun emblems had to be purged because they were symbolizing idea of revolt. It replaced with word of Allah instead. It lead to countless mind scratching situation that how this new emblem resembled to word of Allah. It really did not resemble to the word of Allah.

Looking closer at the IRI emblem, it gave clear vision that it was a Satanic emblem. According to the Holy Bible number of 6.6.6 is a beast name. If one dot from each spot is taking, it gives number 6.6.6. The base needs to be count twice for two reasons. One, it is interwoven and there is a a wave on top, in Persian grammar it repeats a letter as counting would be repeated. Interestingly the wave symbol is symbolized the All Seeing Eye. In addition, there is a pentagram in the flag by attaching far corners to each other it gives a pentagram as pentagram would intercept by the area of the wave. Last, the flag was anti-Christ because it is an up-side down Cross. It may claim that it is a sword which is not because it has no grip.

Last, the regime in Iran stated clearly that it engages in spreading corruption on earth to expedite arrival of last Shiite Saint – Imam Mehdi so that they would join his force to topple tyranny around the world, and establish a just society globally.

Freemason's role in Pahlavi Dynasty

There are some individuals that they claim in Iran there was a Freemason lodge with name of Forough which assisted His Excellency Amir Abbas HOVEIDA to be appointed to the Prime Minister's Office.

The above allegation would be not have any merit because Freemason was a new concept for Iranian community, and when His Excellency was appointed to the high office, the Freemason was a private club which would not allow other race but white male person to join the club. Recently, the club was facing decline in membership, and began to alter its policy by allowing other faith groups, as well as, race to join the Freemason Society.

The Freemason Society did not support Monarchy state. The Freemason Society always brought people to one common denominator in order to revolt against monarchy establishment. Usually banner of the Freemason Society was about democracy, liberty against tyranny. The Freemason Society deemed the monarchy system as a despotic system, and assisted to mobilize people against the establishment which became evident during French Revolution as the Freemason's lodge would be a place to disseminate information with one another. In addition, the Forefather of the US opposed the idea of the Constitutional Monarchy and formed a republic in the US.

The Freemason Society was one controversial society which had a deep root in European history. There were allegation that the above society incorporated Illuminated doctrine, as well as, Theosophy doctrines. The above societies did not have good reputation, and there were allegations of Satan worship. Alex Jones made a documentary, and it should not be taken as an absolute truth, but he documented that world leaders were taking part in worshiping Satan.

Beside the idea of worshiping Satan, it did make sense that former US President CARTER did not like Pahlavi Dynasty in Iran, and decided to topple the regime in Iran. It also made sense that the US regime had amicable relationship with brute state of Iran because they had an agenda of orchestrating Armageddon.

Good luck for anyone for relying on the US or any foreign entities to assist Iranian dissidents to topple the regime in Iran. It would not happen.

The Devil We Know: Dealing With The New Iranian Superpower by Robert Baer

1.This author on prologue section page 1 claimed that in 1978 he was 24 years old young man and was on his way to India, as he had short stop in Iran, Tehran during Marshall laws. This author alleged that "the kamikaze taxi driver who drove me into Tehran from the airport that night taught me my first lesson: Iranians can't drive. The way he swoop and darted between the army patrols, I was …+ read more1.This author on prologue section page 1 claimed that in 1978 he was 24 years old young man and was on his way to India, as he had short stop in Iran, Tehran during Marshall laws. This author alleged that "the kamikaze taxi driver who drove me into Tehran from the airport that night taught me my first lesson: Iranians can't drive. The way he swoop and darted between the army patrols, I was convinced he was trying to draw fire. And was it legal to drive down the sidewalk to get around traffic?" Input: This sidewalk needed to be wide enough as well as accessible for a moving vehicle to drive on it because there is a big gap between road and sidewalk, and the author's statement would be impossible to do so since there is no such a sidewalk in Iran.
2.This author on page 55 alleged that "in October 2000, Ayatollah Khamenei, Ayatollah Khomeini's successor as supreme leader-the only real executive power in Iran-made it clear what the victory in Lebanon meant for Iran. It was during a secret address to Iran's National Security Council. After the usual long preamble, larded with quotations from the Koran, Khamenei put both hands on the conference table." Input: Since he is an intelligent officer, he is required due to nature of his work to be detail orient, and should know that Khamenei's right hand is immobile. As a result, there are cloud of doubts looming on the book as how truthful is this author with his readers.

This author contradicts himself on major points as follow.

1.This author on page 10 asserted that "and it wasn't as if the Iranian government could not close down the opium dens if it wanted to. Iran is a police state. Every day I drove around Tehran, or walked around the streets and bazaars, I was stopped and my papers checked." On page 77 this author claimed that "Iran is not a totalitarian state run by "Islamofascists" who believe they're in some quixotic war with the West." Input: Police state and totalitarian state shared same meaning as a state controls every fabric of a society, as this author experienced in Iran under rule of the mullah in Iran.
2.This author on page 207 claimed that "since 9/11, without any evidence, these people have tried to make the case that Muslims intend to infiltrate the United States, bring down from inside, and convert us to Islam." On page 230-231 this author was talking with Muhammad British-Pakistani born who made a remark about 7/7 which was the way to go and "accept Allah's law," he said. "End of story. Accept Allah's law and I think you'll have a peaceful life." In other words, we either convert to Islam or die." Input: There is a reality that Muslims are planning to convert Western nations to Islam or they have to die.

Author's theory frame work for the cleric regime in Iran:

1.This author was working on theory of green belt or green crescent which was orchestra by former democrat president Jimmy Carter to contain communism in the region. As this author claimed that the cleric regime in Iran has infiltrated in Afghanistan, Lebanon, Palestine and Iraq and the regime in Iran was in charge of the situation in the region. Also, Turkey was under spill of the regime too but not as strongly as other region. As a result, the cleric regime in Iran is a superpower. This author lacked understanding the term superpower which means a state is in leading position in the international system and has ability to influence on international events. Current regime in Iran is not able to control international event, and has been struggling about its nuclear programs. The regime in Iran is not a great power either which would have economic, military, diplomatic and cultural strength. The current regime in Iran is a rouge state, which is an authoritarian regime, absent of human rights, and seeking weapon of mass destruction.
2.This author was claiming that the regime in Iran is no longer relying on terrorism to advance its interest. However, the cleric regime has been targeting Iranian dissidents and have been murdering them around the world.
3.This author on page 15 claimed that the US do not understand the regime in Iran because of Iranian dissidents are lobbying the White House and the White House does not have clear understanding of Iran. According to the record, so far element of the cleric regime on individual base or as a council like National Iranian American Council had opportunity to meet senior staffs and elected politicians, and to mislead the White House and not Iranian dissidents.
4.This author is working on fear tactic that price of oil on rise and on page 198 this author says it is in best interest of the US to negotiate with the regime in Iran. However, he does not provide any information or strategy how to negotiate with the regime in Iran.

Author was bias toward Iran:

1.On page 9, this author claimed that there was no moral police officers in Iran. However, the regime has moral police officers who are enforcing Islamic dress code in Iran

Our Man In Tehran by Robert Wright

www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFO4RuL-KYU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33o9U7DtEy8&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwWCS88UfG8&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl9_t3UjetM



1.

On page 8 this author stated the shah had indeed married the girl, Gilda Soufi... Ottawa obliged. Not even the KGB knew that the shah had taken a fourth wife." According to historical fact, King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI married three times, and at each time of his marriage, there was monogamy relationship. Thus, this author's claim that the King was involved in a polygamy relationship was false. In addition, this author was reverberating the theocratic regime's propaganda in Iran that the King had a mistress. After careful consideration, this author left a taste that he has a connection with the regime in Iran.
2.

On page 17, this author put a great leverage on 1953 coup which was orchestrated by the US. According to CIA documents, it did not take part in 1953 coup in Iran, the below weblink would shed lights on 1953 coup in Iran.
3.

http://iranzamin2529.blogspot.com/2009/04/1953-coup-detat-in-iran.html
4.

On page 21, this author mentioned that the King called himself, King of Kings or Shahanshah, Light of Aryan. As a matter of fact, it was part of Iran's political culture to refer to all Iranian/Persian monarchs as King of Kings. The Light of Aryan title was given to Him by academic arena. The King also had another title, Great Chief and Commander of of Imperial Army.
5.

On several pages, this author mentioned that SAVAK agents had torture machines in their homes. The above allegation emerged on the surface after victory of 1979 Revolution in Iran. After careful consideration, the above allegation had no merit. First, victims would be in pain and would be making loud noises, so neighbors would know that there were problems. Last, this author claimed that there were victims body parts. Obviously, these places would cause staunch. Currently, there are SAVAK agents all over the world, and none ever brought international courts.
6.

This author mentioned several times about armories were present in the streets. Indeed, in 1970's, Quebec wanted to separate from rest of Canada, and there were individuals that they engaged in terrorist activities. There were marshal laws in place, and absent of civil liberty. Of course, in the above case, the end justify the meaning. However, in case of Pahlavi, it would be constituted as brutality.
7.

On page 50, this author needed to read General Robert Huyser's book " Mission to Tehran" that how he prevented the Imperial Iranian Armed Forces to stage a coup in Iran. In addition, he was puzzled why Carter's administration was forcing General Toufanian to buy more weapons from the US.
8.

This author illustrated bias toward 1979 revolution by calling former Generals with derogatory names while this author was praising the revolutionary people.
9.

This author had no firm grasp of Iran's 1979 Revolution because he was referring to King Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as Reza Pahlavi.
10.

There were plenty of grammar mistakes.
11.

This author also invented his own version of history by claiming that Khomeini's sons, Ahmad and Mustafa were well trained in military skills. In fact, Ahmad, and Mustafa were pleasently plum, and Mustafa died as a result of over eating.
12.

The bottom line, this book reminder of BBC propaganda

Where This World Affair is Heading

It is since January 2011 that the world is witnessing a global chaos. The US pretends that it is not involved, but it is involved. The US is not seeking global stability but global chaos because the US is selling weapons to the nations.

Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi-Blue Eyes People

In this video clip, Hi Imperial Majesty, King of Kings Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI clearly stated that the Western world needed to wake-up, and start being responsible for their action with regard to consumption of fossil fuel. The free ride of fossil fuel had come to an end. In addition, His Imperial Majesty, in His book "Answer to History" predicated that the West would pay more than $75.00 US per barrel.

US hands in Egypt

It was very puzzling that the US was pursuing policy of regime change in Egypt, and all of sudden it made sense when the TIME magazine mentioned Honsi MUBARAK received his military training in Russia. The article left an impression that since Russia was nemeses of the US, it made Mr. MUBARAK unreliable allied to the US. The article mentioned that after Camp David, 1979 treaty, Egypt was sending recent recruit officers to the US for military training which made them more flexible in regard treating civilians. This portion of the article sent another shock wave that Imperial Iranian Armed Forces during reign of monarchy were trained in the US, and this magazine was cheering for their execution in 1979.

It became clear after reading the Economist, and the TIME magazines that the only reason Egyptian officers did not open fire at demonstrators because they were trained in the US. It was possible that these officers were loyal to the US. In addition, there was a person with name of Wisner who was consulting MUBARAK on foreign and domestic politics and he too like past time of Iran, pushing agenda of human rights with Mubarak. Thus, the US decided to appoint someone in Egypt that s/he would be allied of the US without any kind of Marxist history. Furthermore, the US is using the moment to transform the African nations by eradicating Russia's allies, and establishing the US friends in order to control the region.

Perhaps, the above events explained why Prince Ali Reza PAHLAVI had to die so Crown Prince Reza PAHLAVI would know that He was not allow to emancipate Iran.

Do not Cry for Iran

The recent events in Africa which took place in Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia, it sent a shock wave to the regime in Iran that it was at mercy of its people. Once, again, the rouge state in Iran relied on its puppets like Khatami to act as a wise voice for public's frustration. In fact, the state in Iran has all intention to show everyone that who was the boss, and was in-charge of the country. On Monday Feb 14th, 2011 Sanea Jaleh, a 26-year-old was killed by security forces in Iran. Of course, the security forces in Iran are not Iranians, they are from other region of the world that mullahs brought in Iran to suppress Iranians.

Lying is a huge industry in Iran, and the mullahs with their associates like Revolutionary Guards, Besij, and plain clothes are good at lying.

I hope, one day, Iranians would wake-up and realize by following mullahs whether he is wearing a green turban, or white turban, or anything associated with the regime in Iran is not a solution for their problems, but total removal of the rouge IRI was the only key to a better future for everyone. Obvious, the regime will come down with heavy hand on people, and only option is a military intervention to topple the regime in Iran.

Iranium the movie

Iranium the movie

http://www.facebook.com/IraniumTheMovie#!/IraniumTheMovie?v=app_6009294086

Transformation of Middle East

It appears that the Middle East is going through a transformation of Islamization. Turkey is moving toward a conservative theology state. Egypt is brink of collapse in hands of Jihadist, Tunis felt apart because its leader fell off the favor of people, Jordan decided to reform its political restructure by allowing people to elect politicians to the parliament.

One thing is clear, the regime in Iran exported its revolution outside of its border. There is one more ingredient on this stew that Muslim population is on rise compare to other faiths in faster rate. Good luck everyone because you need one.

Canada Land of Dictator

I was reading the below paper, and papers, as it proved to me that Canada support dictator by allowing the dictators to invest in Canada, and use Canada for their good times.

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Members+Tunisia+family+Canada+residents+minister/4153918/story.html

The relatives of ousted Tunisian president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali who arrived in Canada are permanent residents and not asylum-seekers, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney said yesterday.

Kenney, attending a Conservative party meeting in Ottawa, said some members of Ben Ali's family "are permanent residents" and "have the right to be in Canada."

He spoke days after one of Ben Ali's many brothers-in-law arrived in Montreal aboard a private jet accompanied by his wife, their children and a governess, according to news reports confirmed by a government official.

Ben Ali's wife Leila Trabelsi has several brothers, and the official declined to say which one had arrived in Canada. The family reportedly checked into a hotel in Montreal.

A spokesman for a Montrealbased group formed to support Tunisians who have risen up against Ben Ali's government told The Gazette he was dismayed to hear that Canada had allowed his relatives into the country.

"We're very disappointed that Canada has accepted these people who are directly related to the dictatorship and to the family that has been ruling Tunisia for the past 23 years," said Haroun Bouazzi, of the Collectif de solidarite au Canada avec les luttes sociales en Tunisie.

Bouazzi, who was born and raised in Tunisia but has lived in Canada for the past 11 years, said the Canadian government should have refused entry to Ben Ali's family even if they were carrying the proper documentation.

"When Ben Ali left Tunisia, he was still president, and countries like Malta and France didn't accept him even then," he said. "Countries always have a choice to be on the side of the Tunisian people."

An official at Citizenship and Immigration Canada said Saturday that Ottawa was not offering asylum to Ben Ali's family.

Ben Ali fled to Saudi Arabia this month after weeks of violent protests against his iron fisted rule.

Yesterday, hundreds of Tunisians defied a night-time curfew and camped out in front of Prime Minister Mohammed Ghannouchi's office in a bid to force the government to resign.

Protesters said the revolt against Ben Ali has not gone far enough and should be followed up by the removal of all old-regime figures from the leadership and the abolition of Ben Ali's powerful RCD party.

© Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette

Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/Members+Tunisia+family+Canada+residents+minister/4153918/story.html#ixzz1CsNs4Ct7

Iranium

This video clip is a perfect incriminating evidence that Canada had a prior knowledge that the regime in Iran was a normative control model, and allowed elements of IRI to use Canada as an economic nest to harbor terrorism. In addition, Canadian Government took part in plundering Iran's wealth. There are questions which needed to be answer by the Canadian Government.

1. Why now Canada decided to expose evil side of IRI?
2. Why Canada sold nuclear materials to the regime in Iran. Despite of fact, Canada had prior knowledge that the regime is building nuclear bombs?
3. Today, Canada has become a rich country because the regime in Iran funneled money in Canada and build assets like Center Point Mall, HWY 407 and many more assets in Canada. What will become of these assets?

George Bush attacked Iraq because Saddam had WMD, and the US sold those WMD to Iraq which were used during Iran-Iraq War. Yesterday, Canada sold nuclear materials to the regime in Iran, and now Canada is acting as a crusader. It is doubtful that Canada is acting in a good faith.

Canadians are Blackmailing Iranians

After 1979 Revolution in Iran, it became very obvious for Iranians that the US wanted the Pahlavi Dynasty to collapse so that the US would sell arsenal to the theocratic regime in Iran at black market value. The regime in Iran was forcing everyone shout death to America as a sign that the regime in Iran had no ties with the regime in Iran. The curtain failed down, when the Iran Contra Affair became a public knowledge that how the US was selling arsenal to the regime in Iran at the black market value so that the regime in Iran would continue its war with Iraq from 1980 to 1988. There was also public knowledge that Khomeini and his associates were puppet of the US until Dr. and author Mike EVANS revealed in his book “Jimmy Carter: The Liberal Left and World Chaos: A Carter/Obama Plan That Will Not Work” how former democrat US president funneled money to Khomeini HENDI directly in order to support him to topple the Pahlavi Dynasty.

Today, Canada is playing the same dirty game as it was played with Iranians by the US. Recently, Canada made a film that the regime in Iran is pursuing nuclear. Interestingly, Canada sold nuclear means to the regime in Iran, despite the fact that the Canadian Security Intelligence Service had prior knowledge of the ambition of the cleric in Iran to proliferate nuclear bombs. The above statement was posted on this blog and the below web link proves that it was mentioned in the past Canada was helping the regime in Iran to build nuclear bombs.

http://iranzamin2529.blogspot.com/2009/04/justice-for-all.html

The intention of Canada is not to embarrass the regime in Iran and to isolate the regime in Iran from the International Communities, but it is blackmailing the Iranians. Obviously, Canada sold nuclear means to Iran, plus, it is allowing elements of the regime in Iran to us Canada as a safe heaven for their terrorist activities. Like Rafsanjani who owes HWY 407 in province of Ontario and Center Point Mall, and revenue from the above assets would be used for terrorist activities.

Concluding the above statements, the recent movie Canada made about exposing the regime in Iran is pursuing nuclear ambition, Canada is asking for something big from the regime in Iran in form of monetary value. Sadly, Iranians are paying for request of Canada. One more time Canada is plundering Iranians with their dirty games.

Why the West Hates Us

Why the West Hates Us

On Tuesday January 04^th, 2011 Prince Ali Reza PAHLAVI curtailed his owned life with one bullet in his head, sometimes around 02:30 hours. The above news spread around the globe with speed of light and with massive force of shock and disbelief that Prince Ali Reza PAHLAVI, who was well known as a fine gentle soul among residences of Boston, he decided to claim his own life. The news brought further pain and agony for friends and compatriots of Iran that they have been enduring, normative control model of tyrannical theology state in Iran, since 1979. Despite the above solemn condolence to the surviving family of Pahlavi, the above tragedy provided another ammunition to the Western world, particularly the Western medias to engage in their malicious attack on the Pahlavi Dynasty by utilizing Iran's left wing sympathizers that they had no emotion for sovereignty and integrity of Iran, and were working hard under disguise of Marxist-Islamist to hand over Iran to former Soviet Union. Once their master plan failed because the Islamist wing acted quicker than the left wing by organizing kangaroo trials against the left wings after triumph of the 1979 Revolution. If the Islamist faction would not act first, the left wing factions would launch its own butcher shop against the religious faction. The left wing factions would denied the above statement. However, the Communist Manifesto which was the left wing doctrine, it would abolish all religious institutions which was already done in the former Soviet Union, and the left wing factions in Iran would follow same foot step at the Mother Russia. Thus, no one stole the 1979 Revolution, it was just matter of time who would strike first. The above incident caused some left wing factions to flee Iran due to absent of safety and security in Iran, and settled in the US. These individuals did not move to one communist nation; such as, the former Soviet Union which had a border with Iran, and could cross the border. However, they traveled from Iran and settled in the US. According to the left wing factions. The US was a terrible country due its involvement in Vietnam, and they would chant death to America. Plus, the left wing factions despise the Western nations because they adopted capitalist economic system. Quite frankly, the left wing factions were hypocrite by high volume.

Today, the Western world is using the left wing factions as a secure measure, one more time, to bash the Pahlavi Dynasty, and to prolong the theology state in Iran. In this particular case, when Prince Ali Reza PAHLAVI departed from this world, the TIME magazine utilized Dr. Abbas MILANI who is a communist, he hates the monarchy system, and worked with terrorist organizations to topple the Pahlavi Dynasty. The TIME magazine provided a window of opportunity to him, and presented him as a researcher and scholar on contemporary history of Iran, as Dr. MILANI managed to give his negative review on Pahlavi Dynasty that Pahlavi family was egocentric.¹ In addition, Azadeh Moaveni in her book Lipstic Jihad stated that her parents were left wing and wanted to hand over Iran to Palestine. She also engaged in a dirty game of bashing the Pahlavi Dynasty. However, there is another reality on the surface. When the media is interacting with public, the Pahlavi Dynasty receives positive review, and want monarchy to be restore. The below video clips are speaking in high volume as ordinary people express sorrow and sadness about loss of Ali Reza PAHLAVI and are hoping one day to PAHLAVI Dynasty would bring back justice for them, and do not want light of Pahlavi to diminish. Furthermore, the Western media in Canada went further Crusader by claiming that the Crown Prince Heir to Throne of Iran Reza PAHLAVI had no supporter in Iran, and only Mir Hussein MOSAVI was true opposition leader in Iran.² Quite frankly, there was no opposition party in Iran, this was a theology state in Iran which had element of normative control model, it was like an apple which was divided in half.

Let ask smart Canadians, how are they enjoying about money laundry of Rafsanjani that he is doing in Canada by building HWY 407 and Center Point Mall in Province of Ontario? How Canada is loving it by given citizenship status to Rafsanjani and many other Revolutionary Guards in Canada that they did not spend a day in Canada. Enough said about Canada, Canadians lack morality, they are used to culture of native killing and enslaving black people and cannot be expect anymore.

The bottom line, the West hates us because the theology state in Iran has financial gain for the West. Otherwise, the Red Cross and other Non-Governmental Organizations which are instrumental to spread propaganda would cry out that the regime in Iran was violating human rights and needed to do something about it, and the state in Iran would collapsed.

1http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2040830,00.html

2http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/World/20110105/alireza-pahlavi-found-dead-in-us-home-110105/

Iran-Mane by Afshin

Tragedy of Prince Ali Reza PAHLAVI

It is hard to believe that 44 years old man took his own life because he left Iran in 1979 with no prospect of returning home. In addition, it would be unthinkable to think that Ali Reza PAHLAVI took his own life due to his younger sister's death tragedy as she ended her own ilfe back in 2001 because he had first hand experience about the emotional impact about suicide on family members.

It would be savvy to look into detail of death of Leila PAHLAVI. It was summer of 2001, she took her life in England. On September 09th, 2001 Shah Mansour was assassinated in Afghanistan. On September 11th, 2001 the world trade centers collapsed as the war on terror began.

In regard to current event, someone look at the Economist magazine and would see that the cover page illustrated President Obama is contemplating a war game. Or did Crown Prince Heir to Throne of Iran was planning certain action. Consequently, Prince Ali Reza PAHLAVI was eliminated as a warning sign to him?

Indeed, it is hard to believe for two reasons that such a nice person may ended his life or there are some other factors behind doors that we do not know of.

H.I.M Ali Reza PAHLAVI

It is with utmost regret to believe that H.I.M Ali Reza PAHLAVI ended his life at age of 44. It would be most respectable for medium outlets to let Iranians, and most importantly the Royal Family to mourn in peace, and not keep talking about the 1953 Coup, as well as, the 1979 Revolution.

Danny Fernandes - Addicted