Justice for All

The Motto of the Theology State in Iran

The Motto of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI), it is better to be feared than to be loved. The IRI is using Iron Fist by utilizing Machiavelli doctrine of Fear, Fraud and Force to rule Iran.

Think Independently, and freely because you are a free person.




Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Iran lawmakers seek U.S. friendship


By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press
Iranian deputies were gathering signatures to try and form an Iranian-U.S. friendship committee in parliament to hold contacts with the U.S. Congress, legislators involved in the effort said Tuesday.
It was the first effort organized by parliament to find a way to bridge nearly three decades of estrangement between the U.S. and Iran. It comes days after the governments of the two countries agreed to hold direct talks on one of the main issues dividing them — the conflict in Iraq.
Darioush Ghanbari, one of at least 10 deputies who has signed the document calling for the establishment of the committee, said Iranian parliamentarians were seeking to reduce tensions with America and "explain Iran's realities to the U.S. Congress."
The document had signatures from both conservatives and reformists and more signatures from the 290-member legislature were expected by the end of the day, Ghanbari said.
"In the absence of formal diplomatic relations, we seek to establish a parliamentary relationship with the U.S. Congress and fill the existing gap of contacts between the two nations," Ghanbari, a pro-reform lawmaker, told The Associated Press.
No specific number of deputies is required to form such a committee. The document signed by lawmakers will be presented to the parliament's speaker, who has the right to accept or reject it.
It was unclear what he would do. The speaker is Gholam Ali Haddad Adel, a close associate of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who holds final say in all matters in Iran. Haddad Adel is considered a relative moderate among the conservatives and hard-liners who make up Iran's top leadership, and it is likely he would consult with Khamenei before taking any decision.
Washington severed diplomatic ties with Tehran after Iranian militant students stormed its embassy in Tehran in 1979, to protest America's refusal to hand over Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi for trial.
Ever since, talk of ties with the United States has long been a taboo among Iran's hard-line clerical leadership. Hard-liners stymied cautious efforts by reformists in the late 1990s to open up contacts with Americans — though the leadership has condoned occasional talks on specific issues with Washington.
One hard-line lawmaker, Saeed Aboutaleb, denounced the effort to create the friendship committee, saying Tuesday, "the nation will strike the mouth of these lawmakers."
Khamenei's stance on the committee was not known. But Iran's acceptance of ambassador-level talks with the U.S. on improving Iraq's security could be a sign the supreme leader sees the need for contact with the United States amid the two countries' escalating tensions.
The United States accuses Iran of fueling Iraq's violence by backing militants there, a charge Iran denies. Tehran, in turn, says the U.S. troop presence in Iraq is the cause of the country's turmoil. Washington and its allies also accuse Iran of seeking to build nuclear weapons — a charge Iran also denies — and the United Nations has imposed limited sanctions on Iran for refusing to suspend uranium enrichment.
The Iraqi government — which is backed by the United States but also close to Iran — has pushed for the two countries to end their disputes.
Proponents of the friendship committee said it could help avert anti-Iranian legislation by the U.S. Congress.
"If (Iranian) government officials are reconciling with Americans, why can't the Iranian nation reconcile with the American people?" said Jalal Hosseini, another Iranian reformist lawmaker who signed the petition.
"We are seeking to form this friendship committee to undermine anti-Iran policies of the Bush administration and show our good will and our peace-loving spirits," he said.

Monday, May 14, 2007

Who Are Iranian Women?

There was a time that Iranian women were as equal as men, you better read below paper and judge for yourself.


Famous Historical Persian Women
by: Dr. X
http://www.rozanehmagazine.com/JanuaryFebruary06/afamouswomen.html

Persians, Patriots, Friends and Comrades:
My word is particularly with you, The Persian Woman,
The purpose of this article is specifically for the Persian youth and then the Persians in general, to know their valuable historical Persian Women. The youth shall be aware of their rich & glorious history. Women in Ancient Persian Empire were valuable beings; they often had important positions in the Courthouse, Ministries, Military, State Department, and other official administrations. Later on, during the First Arabo_Islamic Invasion_Occupation (651 AD), some of the Persian Women gathered Commando & Guerrilla armies, & some associated with their fellow men, combining the resistance forces against the foreign oppressor.
Those brave Persian Women with cooperation of their brave male partners, had managed to free Iran from the "First Arabo_Islamic Invasion_Occupation" (651 AD). The sacrifices of Iranian men & women, under the leadership of Yaqub Leis Saffarid, the son of a simple Ironsmith, had freed Iran on 873 AD and ended 222 years of Arabo_Islamic occupation (651 AD - 873 AD) of Iran. Now we are once agian under the occupation. Do you have what it takes to end the "Second Arabo_Islamic Invasion_Occupation" (1979 AD) of Iran?!
It is essential for the Persian Women to know & understand their glorious history of the past, because without it, they will not be able to plant their place in the future of Iran. Young Iranian ladies shall understand that they were not born as second rate citizens, yet this is an Islamic present to the Iranian women! Islam had made an abomination out of proud Persian women!
This article is also for the viewers to observe & compare/comparison the value of the Persian women in the past & the present insult & oppression of the Islamic Regime towards them. Imagine @ a certain era women in Iran were wisely running the country, yet @ the present, they practically count as properties of men, legally they count as half of men in all legal documents, physically they should be wrapped in bondage of hejab & chador, so the men will not be sexually turned on (ultimate Islamic male chauvinism)! Technically, according to Quran, women were originally created from a rib bone of the man! Women cannot attend certain important positions such as judicial, military, etc., for the reason that they are not completely alert @ all times! This is due to the reason that they go through the monthly cycle, & PMS! During this period, they cannot & are not qualified to run sever political positions in the government, religion, judicial, military, etc.
Islamic Scholars have went as far as calling women "Naqes ol Aql" (Mentally Retarded)! Islam clearly states that women are second rate citizens! They must be manhandled, owned, protected, well covered, safe kept & if not obedient, then must be beaten by firm hands of muslim men!
Women of Iran, once upon a time, you were Queens, ministers, secretaries of state, Generals, & Admirals, & Empress of the land, yet now you are petty slaves, properties, & sub human wrapped in bondage of hejab, looking like crows or penguins! Isn't it time to wake up? The day will come for the women of Iran to put things right, that will be the day that the Mullahs shall be afraid of the sweet revenge .....
Persian Woman, you were not born incarcerated behind the Chador and Lachak! The day will come for you to burn the chador and lachak; therefore, you can regain your status as a Persian Woman. Look @ what you were and what you are! This is your wake up call!
Observe the beautiful names & deep meanings of the Persian names, then review a few female Arabic names & check the silly, superficial meanings of them in encyclopedia, you be the judge! Here are the results of my research, hope you enjoy.
Historical and Famous Persian Women (The meaning of the names are in parenthesis.)
1. Doqdu (selected) Mother of Zartosht Spantman (Zarathustra Spitmata), the Persian Philosopher/Prophet.
2. Hovi (owner of the fine cattle) Devoted wife of Zartosht Spantman.
3. Chista (intelligent) The wise daughter of Zartosht Spantman, great preacher of Zoroastrianism.
4. Mandana (eternal) Wife of Cambysis, mother of Cyrus the Great (the 1st Persian Emperor & the writer of the first declaration of human rights in the globe, named The Cyrus Cylinder).
5. Amitis (wise friend) Shahbanu of Iran, daughter of Astiak shah of Mad (The Median King), Wife of Cyrus the Great.
6. Atusa (beautiful body) Shahbanu of Iran, wife of Darius the Great, daughter of Cyrus the Great, mother of Xerxes the Great (Kheshayar Shah).
7. Esther (Star) Shahbanu of Iran, wife of Xerxes.
8. Pantea (strong & immortal) Commander of the Immortal Guards, Achaemenids Dynasty. An important & sensitive military commander of Cyrus the Great, wife of General Aryasb the Achaemenid's Arteshbod (General).
9. Artunis (true & faithful) Commander of Achaemenid's Army, daughter of Artebaz, Sepahbod (Lieutenant General) of Darius the Great. She was a mighty brave woman.
10. Pari Satis (angel-like) Arteshbod (General) of Achaemenid's Army, wife of Darius the Second.
11. Mahruyeh (pretty face) Shahbanu (Queen) of Iran, wife of Cambysis (Kambujiye) the Second.
12. Amestris (friend) Achaemenid's military commander, daughter of Darius the Second.
13. Aspas (guard of strength) Commander of Achaemenid's police, daughter of Ardeshir the Second.
14. Artemis (the great speaker of truth) Artemis or Artemisia, The legendary Grand Admiral & leader of the Persian Navy during Xerxes, Xerxes' great love. A great powerful, independent & intelligent woman.
15. Sisi Cambis (fortunate) Queen Mother, mother of Darius the Third, she was a remarkable Achaemenid woman who fought, resisted & did not surrender to Alexander the drunk, an epileptic, delusional, alcoholic, homosexual, megalomaniac Macedonian Tyrant. Alexander was very much found of her & had a crush on her!
16.Roxanna (very bright & beautiful) Princess of Achaemenid, daughter of Darius the Third.
17. Estatira (Creation of the stars) Sepahbod Princess (Lieutenant General) of Achaemenid's Army, daughter of Darius the Third.
18. Youtab (unique) Commander of Achaemenids' Army, sister of the legendary Persian Hero, Aryobarzan (Achaemenid's General), she stood side by side to her brother & fought the Greeks & Macedonians to death.
19. Artadokht (Truthful girl) Secretary of Treasury during Ardavan the Fourth of Ashkanids Dynasty.
20. Sura (Flower Face) One of the Greatest Heroines of Persian History, A strategical & Military Genius. Ashkanid's General, Sepahbod (Lieutenant General) of Ashkanid Empire, daughter of Ardavan the Fifth, father's right hand.
21. Azarmidokht (Youthful girl) Empress of Iran, daughter of Khosrow Parviz, ruled Iran after her sister Purandokht, Sassanid Dynasty.
22. Purandokht (Sexy & beautiful girl) Empress of Iran, Older sister of Azarmidokht, older daughter of Khosrow Parviz, ruled Iran.
23. Shirin (sense of sweetness) Shahbanu of Iran, wife of Khosrow Parviz Sassanid.
24. Parin (same as an angel) Sassanid Princess, daughter of Qobad, Counselor of the Sassanid Courthouse, extremely intelligent politician.
25. Turandokht (Turanian girl) Sassanid Princess, daughter of Khosrow Parviz, sister of Azarmidokht & Purandokht.
26. Golandam (flower body) Shahbanu of Iran, wife of Bahram Gur Sassanid.
27. Zand (precious) Wife of Khosrow Anushirvan Sassanid, niece of Bahram Chubin the Sassanid General.
28. Apranik (daughter of elder) Sassanid's Great Military Commander, daughter of Piran, the great General of Yazdgird the Third. She fought gracefully, as a resistance commander, fighting against Arabo_Islamic Invaders_oppressors during the Arab Invasion, killed many of the Tazis & done many damages to the Savage Arab Army.
29. Negan (good destiny) A freedom Fighter Leader, A Guerrilla Commander during Sassanids & after the occupation, one of the major resistance fighters of Iran against the Arab Invasion.
30. Banu (Lady) Wife of Babak Khoramdin (Persian Legendary Freedom Fighter), she fought side by side to her husband Babak. After the occupation of Iran by the Arab Hounds, Banu & Babak worked as revolutionary resistance fighters leading the Persian Resistance Militia. She fought to the end.
31. Buran (Pretty) The Persian Prime Minister of the Islamic Empire during Caliphate Ma'mun of Abbassids, Buran was the wise Wazir during the occupation of Iran by Arab oppressors, She was daughter of Hassan Sahl, she has done many goods for the Persians & Persian status under the occupation of Caliphate.
32. Azad (Free) Daylami Guerrilla Commander, a partisan leader from north Iran, who fought for many years with her band of freedom fighters against the Arab Oppressors, during the Occupation era.
Persian, name your children Persian. Persian, live Persian, love Persian and Die a Proud Persian
This brings us to the end of our research, may this document shed some light to the truth seekers & the bright minds of Iran.
Iranian women, think for a second, Think about who you were then! Think about who are you now? You shall arise, Once again, such as The Phoenix (Qoqnos), you shall arise from the ashes of defeat, oppression, Islamic slavery & suffocation. Once more, you shall break the chains of Islam from your hands & feet. Once again, you shall dump the Arabo_Islamic book of slavery (Quran) in Dumpster of history! Once again you shall gain your status next to the proud Persian men. Iranian women, my words are with you, never surrender, never accept leash of Islamic slavery, never accept your status as one of the many temporary (Siqeh) wives or one of the four permanent (Aqdi) wives of a Muslim chauvinist Male Pig! You are not Siqeh, Aqdi or Concubines, but you are proud Persian women.
Young Iranian woman, Your place is high in the skies of Persia, Your place is not by the foot of a Muslim man, as a lap dog! Arise and break the Arabo_Islamic Chain of slavery, Arise and regain your lost "Persian Prestige", Arise and once more, regain your humanity! You are a proud Persian Woman.
Woman, Stand Up Now!
I want you to right @ this moment, go out & stand in the middle of the streets of Iran or exile, tell yourselves, you are proud Persian women, then shout it from the top of your lungs:
"I am a proud Persian Woman, I will break the chains, Hear me roar, Hear me roar!"
I promise you, The Resistance will be victorious.
Many are schooled, yet only a few are truly educated!
Pure Persian Pride
Dr. X

What does this spy has to offer?

Author of below paper is Caesar, who is a world citizen. As he expressed his view on Hessuein Derakhshan with respect to his comment to Madam Afshin Jam.
I've heard these statements about Nazanin Afshin-Jam before. People such as Hussein Derakhshan, and others of his ilk, love making snide remarks about Nazanin's fluency in the Persian language, or claims about her rough knowledge about Iranian politics when she was Miss Canada 2003. Peyman, these are desperate -and truly pathetic- arguments against the woman.

I posted a reply to Derakhshan's blog and asked him, for the sake of argument, to suppose that these things about Nazanin were true? So what? Such comments refer to a younger Nazanin from four years ago. People grow in four years and Ms. Afshin-Jam at only 28, seems nowadays quite well-versed on Iranian politics. Furthermore, I asked him, what does being fluent in a language have to do with one's love and concern for one's people and heritage? I know plenty of proud Italian-Americans, Polish-Americans, etc. who don't speak the language of their ancestors. Anyway, none of this trivial fluff has anything to do with what this girl has done for Nazanin Fatehi or other Iranian women - or the humanitarian work she is doing in Asia or Africa as well.

Of course, I see my comments were not posted on that blog.
My view, people like Mr. Derakhshan is outdated and have no credibility.

Sunday, May 06, 2007

The IRI is Number One Enemy of Iran

LONDON, (CAIS) -- 1000-hectare area of a historical site belonging to Parthian dynastic era (248 BCE-224CE) in Khuzestan province has fall victim of development constructions of Islamic regime’s Hamidieh Azad University in Hamidieh city.

The destructive activities of Islamic Azad University, which prior to this has demolished large parts of Sasanian Ivan Karkheh during its construction works and agricultural activities raised the objections of cultural heritage authorities in Khuzestan province. However, despite all oppositions made by cultural heritage experts, this 2200-year-old site was not released.

In a talk with Persian service of CHN, Mojtaba Gahtotuni, member of Khuzestan cultural heritage enthusiasts association said: “With removing the soil with mechanical shovel, Islamic Azad University is destroying a Parthian historic site located on west of Ahvaz - Hamidieh road in order to construct the building of the university.”

Considering that this area has already been registered on 8th of March 2003 with number of 7930 in list of Iran’s National Heritage sites, and existing of architectural evidence in the area, cultural heritage enthusiasts immediately took actions to protect the area against damages posed to it and asked the authorities of the project to stop construction of Hamidieh Islamic Azad University in this historical site.

According to Gahsotuni, Hamidieh gas station is also located on ruins of this historic area, however, Iran’s Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization has made no measure in this regard.

It seems a number of pre-Islamic historical sites and monuments have been targeted by Islamic Azad University in Khuzestan province for establishing its branches. Settling of the official department of this university in Abadan historical church has also evoked the objection of cultural heritage enthusiasts.

U.S., Iraqi forces find Sadr City torture chamber

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- A pre-dawn coalition military raid killed at least eight gunmen and uncovered a bloodstained torture chamber in a building in Baghdad's Sadr City that was later destroyed by a powerful controlled explosion.
But throughout Sunday insurgents wreaked havoc by killing at least 45 people and wounding dozens of others in multiple bomb attacks.
The deadliest bomb attack took place in a market in southwestern Baghdad's Bayaa section around noon. An Iraqi interior ministry official said a parked car bomb explosion killed 33 people and wounded 74 others.
Insurgents frequently target busy markets to produce the most carnage. Police and government officials are also prime targets.
One police officer was killed and three others were wounded while patrolling Baghdad's Saydia neighborhood when a roadside bomb exploded, an interior ministry official said.
Earlier in the day, six police officers were killed and 10 others were wounded when a suicide car bomber exploded outside the police headquarters in Samarra, located just north of Baghdad.
A Samarra police official said the attack took place just as a curfew imposed to prevent such attacks was lifted. The curfew was immediately reimposed.
The Islamic State of Iraq -- the insurgent umbrella group that includes al Qaeda in Iraq -- had recently warned Samarra police that they would be targeted in future attacks, which prompted the curfew.
Within Baghdad's central Mansour district, at least five people were killed and 10 others were wounded in the blast from an explosives-rigged car parked near the Labor Ministry, an interior ministry official said.
U.S. and Iraqi forces chasing a "terrorist" with ties to Iran early Sunday discovered a bloodstained torture chamber and a massive amount of artillery stored in a building in Baghdad's Sadr City, the U.S. military said.
"Had that thing gone off -- when you start talking about 150 artillery shells -- the extensive damage that it could have done in killing innocent civilians in Sadr City would have been horrific," U.S. military spokesman Maj. Gen. William Caldwell said at a news conference Sunday.
The building was destroyed in a controlled explosion by a U.S. military ordnance team. Video showed a massive pile of rubble, with some debris landing on nearby cars. Other vehicles had shattered windows, possibly from the impact of the blast.
The raid took place in the pre-dawn hours of Sunday, and triggered a gunbattle that left eight to 10 gunmen dead, according to the U.S. military. There were no reports of any casualties among coalition or Iraqi security forces.
There were no reports of any casualties among coalition or Iraqi security forces.
'Secret cell'
Sadr City, a densely populated Shiite neighborhood, is a stronghold of radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's Mehdi Army militia.
Caldwell would not reveal specific information about the "known terrorist" that was the target of the intelligence-driven raid because he was still on the run.
"As best we know this was some kind of Shia extremist element, some sort of secret cell," Caldwell said.
Separately, the U.S. military on Sunday announced the deaths of four U.S. troops in Iraq over the past two days, which brings the number of American service members who have died in Iraq in the first three weeks of May to 14.
All but one of the deaths were combat-related.
A U.S. soldier was killed and four others were wounded when a roadside bomb exploded in western Baghdad Friday, the military said.
Two U.S. Marines were killed Saturday while conducting combat operations in the Anbar Province, the military said.
A Task Force Lightning Soldier died Sunday in a non-combat related incident, the military said.
CNN's Ingrid Formanek and Jomana Karadsheh contributed to this report.

The IRI is enforcing Machiavelli doctrines on Iranian people.

Article One:
Iran ban on 'Western' hairstyles
Monday, 30th April 2007
BBC NewsBy Frances Harrison BBC News, Tehran Iranian police have warned barbers not to give men Western hairstyles or use make up on them. The move is part of an unusually fierce crackdown on what is known locally as bad hijab, or un-Islamic clothing, that this year is also targeting men. Hair stylists have been warned that they could lose their licences if they do not comply. However, police have denied a report that they have ordered barbers not to serve customers wearing ties. Wild Police say that as well as avoiding Western hairstyles and make up, barbers should not pluck customers' eyebrows. Some young boys in Iran sport very wild hair styles, using gel to make their long hair stand on end in a fashion not seen in other countries. Meanwhile newspapers in Iran have quoted the police as saying that 16,000 women and 500 men have been cautioned in the last week over their improper clothing. It is not clear if these figures are nationwide or only apply to the capital, Tehran. Iranian television has said the crackdown on un-Islamic clothing has entered its second phase now where mobile police units will patrol Tehran to look for those who are not observing Islamic dress properly. According to the local media, Tehran's public prosecutor has suggested women who violate dress rules should be exiled from the capital to remote areas of the country. A member of the parliament's legal committee has said there is no legal impediment to doing this.
Article Two:

Tourists not exempt in Iran dress crackdown: police
Monday, 30th April 2007
TEHRAN, April 30, 2007 (AFP) - Iran on Monday warned tourists and other foreigners visiting the country to obey its Islamic dress code in line with a nationwide crackdown against slack dressing, the ISNA news agency reported. "We have asked travel agencies to warn tourists and to explain the laws of this country," said Tehran's deputy chief of police, Hossein Sajedi-Nia. Iran has handed out more than 10,000 warnings over the past 10 days to women deemed to have infringed the dress code in the Islamic republic, and dozens of others have been briefly detained at police stations. Sajedi-Nia indicated there was no chance of a let-up in the crackdown, a regular pre-summer measure being pursued with extra vigour this year, saying that from next week "plain clothes police will go into action." Women must cover their heads and conceal their curves in public in Iran. The law also applies to members of non-Muslim minorities and all visiting foreigners. Thousands of tourists visit Iran every year to enjoy its ancient heritage and mountain scenery, although numbers are kept down by visa regulations and regional tensions affecting tourism throughout the region. Iran is seeking to relax visa rules and improve its accommodation facilities in a bid to massively boost the numbers of annual visitors. The head of Iran's police force, Esmaeel Ahmadi-Moghadam, said that the crackdown on clothing was not a temporary measure and would continue for the sake of personal security for women. "At the moment, women are unable to go in peace to public baths, swimming pools or hotels," he said, referring to an acknowledged problem in Iran where women are often secretly filmed and photographed without their knowledge.

Saturday, May 05, 2007

Canada is violating Human Rights.

Tory would sue organizers of illegal occupations

Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader John Tory

Canadian Press Updated: Fri. May. 4 2007 3:02 PM ET
TORONTO — Environmentalists, union members, First Nations protesters or anyone who engages in illegal blockades and occupations should be taken to court and sued to recover the costs of their actions, Ontario Opposition Leader John Tory said Friday.
Tory said organizers should be forced to bear the costs of protests like the lengthy Six Nations occupation in Caledonia, last month's rail blockade by Bay of Quinte Mohawks in Deseronto or Thursday's occupation of a Hamilton factory by frustrated workers.
Policing the 15-month Caledonia occupation has cost the province tens of millions of dollars, while last month's 30-hour blockade of a rail line in Deseronto paralyzed passenger and freight traffic between Toronto and Montreal.
"Whether it's a group that is protesting some kind of environmental incident, or farmers protesting government policy, or whether it's a First Nations group protesting what are very legitimate land claims, people cannot take the law into their own hands,'' Tory said in an interview.
"If I was made premier, I would use the court system to say to people: we have ways of dealing with our complaints, and they don't include blockades and occupations.''
If the Conservatives win the Oct. 10 provincial election, Tory said he would "aggressively pursue civil remedies'' against people who lead protests that cross the line between free speech and disregard for public safety and the rule of law.
"We can't afford to have businesses shut down, to have passengers inconvenienced, to have policing costs, when people decide that because they have a complaint, they're going to take matters into their own hands,'' he said.
"We have to use the courts, we have to use financial penalties to send these people a message and say: you can't do this. We're not going to put up with this.''
Peter Rosenthal, lawyer for Deseronto protest leader Shawn Brant of the Bay of Quinte Mohawks, said Friday that Tory's position showed his "ignorance'' of the situation where First Nations people are fighting for lands that were taken from them.
"The people who were blocking the trains had their land taken unlawfully from them in 1837,'' said Rosenthal.
"The comparison between the inconvenience of the train blockage and the taking away of land for 170 years; the people really wronged are the First Nations people.''
Rosenthal said he was confident the Bay of Quinte Mohawks would be the victors if the Conservatives won the election and sued them to recover the costs of rail blockade.
"It would be very interesting; let him do it,'' he said.
"The real inequities are such that First Nations people are the people who are owed.''
Finance Minister Greg Sorbara, who is also co-chairing the Liberal government's re-election campaign, said Friday that Tory is trying anything he can think of to attract voters as the fall election draws near.
"John Tory's in a pretty desperate situation. We're getting very close to an election, and we still don't know what his proposals are for the people of Ontario,'' Sorbara said in an interview.
"And to take political advantage of a situation in Caledonia which has taxed us all, I think is pandering rather than campaigning.''
Speaking to the Association of Police Services Boards in Owen Sound earlier Friday, Tory said there must be a better way to manage dissent in Ontario and accused Premier Dalton McGuinty of weak leadership.
"Mr. McGuinty basically has done nothing, and he always pretends that the only choice is between calling in the police and doing nothing. I disagree,'' said Tory.
"I think there is lots that can be done through the courts to dissuade people from engaging people in behaviours that they think is above the law.''
The Conservative leader also expressed concern about illegal occupations of factories such as Thursday's sit-in by 30 workers at steel manufacturer Hamilton Specialty Bar, which ended when the company agreed to pay benefits to about 500 retirees. But Tory said he would launch lawsuits only if such actions hurt the public.
"I'm saying where the public interest is affected, either by way of transportation, or public buildings or other public interests, that's where the government needs the tools to establish the principle that everybody operates under the same set of laws.''
© 2007 All Rights Reserved.

Headscarf war threatens to split Turkey


From The Sunday Times
May 6, 2007
Headscarf war threatens to split Turkey
Christina Lamb, Istanbul
SHE has a gentle face and caring manner. She has completed nine years of medical school and training, including a year as a clinician at a hospital in the Welsh city of Bangor. But at 29, Dr Ayse Maden cannot work in her home country of Turkey as the paediatrician she has trained to be because she wears a headscarf.
“It’s crazy, isn’t it?” she says, pointing at the offending item, which is white with green and black spots on the day we meet. Headscarves are banned inside public offices in Turkey, including schools and hospitals, and Maden has to scrape a living doing occasional medical translation. Yet outside on a busy Istanbul street, almost every woman passing is wearing a headscarf.
It is this simple square of cloth that has provoked a political crisis, exposing a growing rift between Islamists and secularists over Turkey’s direction, and threatening a military coup.
Almost two-thirds of Turkish women wear a headscarf – 62%, according to the Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation – but the prime minister’s nomination of a president whose wife wears a headscarf has produced outrage. More than a million flag-waving protesters came out on to the streets of Istanbul last Sunday.
It also prompted the country’s powerful military to post a warning on the army’s website that it may intervene to protect the secular state laid down by its founder, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.
“The headscarf is a political symbol,” explains Professor Nilufer Narli, head of sociology at Bahcesehir University, who was among the protesters. “People think if the first lady wears a headscarf then many things will change, threatening our whole secular system and forcing all women to wear headscarves.”
Ayse Maden was two years into her degree at the Bosphorus University in Istanbul when the headscarf ban was imposed in 1998. “I had worn it since I was 16 because it is part of my Muslim faith to cover my head,” she said. “It was my dream to be a paediatrician but I couldn’t just stop something that is an important part of my religion.”
For two years she and her headscarf-wearing friends, such as Havva Kaplan, continued trying to get into the university every morning but most days were forced back by the police or the professors. Her parents and professors suggested she stop wearing the scarf or, like many women, wear a wig on top of it. “I cried a lot thinking about it,” she said. In the end she learnt English and went to Hungary to study before going to Wales to work.
Maden and Kaplan are activists for the Women’s Rights Organisation Against Discrimination, set up in 1999 to fight for an end to the ban. They have issued lawsuits against universities, and lobbied MPs and nongovernmental organisations, but Kaplan admits: “We’ve got nowhere.”
Their hopes were dashed when the headscarf ban was upheld by the European Court of Human Rights in 2005 and now they mostly raise money to send headscarf-wearing girls to study overseas.
“It should be our right to wear what we like,” said Kaplan, sitting in an office decorated with paintings of women in headscarves crying behind wire or being silenced by the hands of police. “This ban is excluding women from higher education and denying them jobs.”
Among their friends is a woman with a top degree in international relations who is now taking a cookery course because her headscarf bars her from working as a diplomat. Another is a lawyer who has to pass cases to her brother when they reach court because she cannot appear. And although the ban applies only to state institutions, it deters many firms from employing women in headscarves.
“I don’t understand why people are so scared of the headscarf,” said Kaplan. “We don’t see why Turkey can’t be both modern and Islamic.”
Despite the stark contrast in Istanbul between places such as the glitzy Kanyon centre, where the wealthy shop at Harvey Nichols, and the poor suburb of Fatih where the mosque is the focus of attention, it is common to see scantily clad women arm in arm with those in headscarves and long coats.
But many Turks believe it is a choice, pointing out that the issue takes on much more significance, given Turkey’s geographical position straddling East and West and with neighbours such as Iran and Iraq.
“This is not just a political crisis, it’s a war about a style of life,” says Narli, the sociology professor, tossing back her long, highlighted hair with red manicured nails to match her red high heels. “All my friends are tense and angry and worried about the future for their daughters.”
She points out that the past 30 years has seen an enormous influx of rural people into the cities bringing with them village traditions such as wearing headscarves. At the same time headscarves have been changing. While mothers tended to wear simple scarves tied under the chin, their daughters are using what are known in Turkey as turbans – scarves pinned to cover the neck completely.
“For years the middle classes have been silent but we see our society changing, more and more people wearing turbans and going to Mecca,” said Narli. “It’s like slicing a sausage piece by piece until people decide that’s enough. That’s why many came to the streets to protest for the first time in their lives.”
The battle over the headscarf is not just about religious beliefs. It also represents a clash between a fiercely secular elite, the so-called “white Turks”, and a new urban entrepreneurial class, many of whom came from the countryside. These generally support the Islamic-rooted Justice and Development (AK) party that swept to power in 2002 after an economic collapse.
The issue came to a head 10 days ago when Tayyip Erdogan, the prime minister, nominated his foreign minister, Abdullah Gul, to replace President Ahmet Necdet Sezer, who steps down on May 16. A Gul presidency would mean the country’s parliament, government and presidency would all be controlled by an Islamic party for the first time.
A parliamentary vote in Gul’s favour on April 27 led to the generals’ ultimatum late that night. Describing themselves as “the absolute defenders of secularism”, they added: “When necessary we will demonstrate our attitudes . . . Let no one doubt this.”
Few did: Turkey’s army is Nato’s second biggest with more than 1m soldiers and has ousted four governments in the past 50 years, the latest just 10 years ago.
Last Sunday saw the secularists’ second mass protest in a fortnight, chanting, “No to Shariat [Islamic laws]!” and “We will reconquer Istanbul!” On Monday the Turkish lira tumbled and stocks fell 4%.
There was little surprise on Tuesday night when the constitutional court declared the vote for Gul invalid, invoking a little-known law requiring a quorum of 367 MPs. Parliament brought forward elections to July 22.
An angry Erdogan described the court’s decision as “a bullet fired at democracy” and vowed to press on with Gul’s candidacy. Another vote is scheduled for today but the necessary quorum is not expected to be achieved.
Tens of thousands of people protested against the government in two western cities yesterday, calling for the secular system to be preserved.
Gul is regarded as charming, speaks several languages and, as foreign minister, has overseen negotiations for accession to the EU. “I have been Turkey’s foreign minister Site is currently unavailable .Please come back later

Nice Songs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjhPZPhLjT0&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFhnDC4_O5s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_UPaDYPiWI

Al Qaeda video taunts Bush, Iran, Shiites


From Octavia NasrCNN
Adjust font size:
(CNN) -- A new video from al Qaeda No. 2 man Ayman al-Zawahiri addresses the issue of setting a timetable for withdrawal of troops from Iraq.
The video introduces an interview with al-Zawahiri, and his words are translated into English, with subtitles superimposed throughout. It runs 1 hour, 7 minutes and 35 seconds and was posted Saturday on the Internet.
Although CNN could not independently confirm its authenticity, it was produced by the As-Sahab production company that has taken credit for other al Qaeda tapes.
In one section of the video, an interviewer asks al-Zawahiri to comment on legislation that ties the funding of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan to a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq.
"This bill reflects American failure and frustration," says al-Zawahiri, second-in-command to Osama bin Laden. "However, this bill will deprive us of the opportunity to destroy the American forces which we have caught in a historic trap.
"We ask Allah that they only get out of it after losing 200 to 300 hundred thousand killed, in order that we give the spillers of blood in Washington and Europe an unforgettable lesson, which will motivate them to review their entire doctrinal and moral system which produced their historic criminal Crusader-Zionist entity," al-Zawahiri says.
Al-Zawahiri makes what appears to be a dig at the Baghdad security crackdown started in February -- Operation Enforcing the Law. He apparently is alluding to the failure of coalition forces to stop the suicide bomber who breached security in the Green Zone last month and detonated a bomb in the parliament cafeteria.
"And lest Bush worry, I congratulate him on the success of his security plan and I invite him on the occasion for a glass of juice -- but in the cafeteria of the Iraqi parliament!"
A plea for unity
Speaking during a period when rivalries and feuds are reported among Sunni militants, he urged the Sunni world to unite and "combine its efforts to make the purified sharia the highest authority."
Sharia is the system of Islamic law.
He takes a shot at Iran and Shiites, making reference to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's claim to be in contact with the Mahdi, the 12th and "hidden imam" holy to Shiites, and to the Shiites' claim to be descendants of the Prophet Mohammed.
"Those leaderships are intent on establishing certain concepts which nullify the intellects of their followers and prevent them from understanding the Quran and Sunna, except through their interpretations and explanations, and are intent to gather around themselves the biggest possible number of followers through claims of noble lineages and connections with the unseen in order to use them in political conflicts which often clash with the slogans they used to raise.
"Such as the slogan 'America, the Great Satan,' which became the slogan 'America, the Closest Partner,' and such as the movements which used to claim that they were carrying the message of Islam to liberate the Muslims in Iraq from Saddam the Baathist, but are now sending messages of surrender to keep the forces of Bush the Crusader in the Muslims' lands."
Al-Zawahiri told the Hamas leadership in the Palestinian territories to keep the faith with its staunch tenets. Hamas is considered a terrorist movement by Israel, the United States and the European Union.
"I ask the leadership of Hamas, first, not to turn away from the true rule of sharia and to only agree to participate in elections on the basis of an Islamic constitution," he said.
"And I ask it, second, that if it is given the choice between abandoning government and abandoning Palestine, it should abstain from government and hold on to Palestine and choose jihad and resistance."
Earlier messages
There were other Web messages this year said to be from al-Zawahiri.
In a February message, he called on Muslims to unite under Taliban leader Mullah Omar and to drop their attempts to form secular governments and instead follow only the strict Sharia law.
That video contained a still picture of al-Zawahiri, the audio remarks and English subtitles. Mullah Omar is the elusive, shadowy Taliban leader who slipped away in the early days of the war in Afghanistan.
The Taliban ruled Afghanistan with an iron hand and sheltered al Qaeda before it was toppled by the U.S.-led invasion after al Qaeda's attack on the United States in 2001.
Another al-Zawahiri message was released January 22. It also contained harsh words for President Bush and the United States.

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Beating Freedom of Speech

April 25, 2007On Thursday, April 12, a gang of Somali thugs on a downtown Oslo street attacked Kadra, a Somali woman who now lives in Norway, and beat her senseless, breaking several of her ribs. They were enraged at her for her recent statement that the Qur’an’s views of women needed reevaluation. They also might have been angry because of her role in revealing the widespread support among imams in Norway for female genital mutilation; Kadra exposed their support for this horrific procedure using a hidden camera in a 2000 documentary for Norwegian television.

As they beat her, Kadra’s attackers shouted Allahu akbar – Allah is great – and recited verses from the Qur’an. “I was terrified,” she said. “While I lay on the pavement they kicked me and screamed that I had trampled on the Koran.”

The following Tuesday, two men in Mississauga, Ontario, attacked journalist Jawaad Faizi, who writes for the Pakistan Post, a newspaper based in Mississauga. The attackers told Faizi to stop “writing against Islam,” and particularly to stop criticizing an Islamic organization, Idara Minhaj-ul-Quran, and its leader, a Muslim cleric named Allama Tahir-Ul-Qadri.

Faizi, a native of Lahore, Pakistan, said, “I had so many problems back home as a journalist, but I’m shocked that this is happening here.”

Of course, “writing against Islam,” or being perceived as having done so, has always been dangerous, as Salman Rushdie and many others can attest. The New York Times reported in 2002 that a professor at the University of Nablus in the West Bank, Suliman Bashear, who “argued that Islam developed as a religion gradually rather than emerging fully formed from the mouth of the Prophet,” was for this novel and, from the point of view of traditional Islam, heretical teaching, thrown out of a second-story window by his students. In 1947, the Iranian lawyer Ahmad Kasravi was murdered in court by Islamic radicals; Kasravi was there to defend himself against charges that he had attacked Islam. Four years later, members of the same radical Muslim group, Fadayan-e Islam, assassinated Iranian Prime Minister Haji-Ali Razmara after a group of Muslim clerics issued a fatwa calling for his death. In 1992, the Egyptian writer Faraj Foda was murdered by Muslims enraged at his “apostasy” from Islam — another offense for which traditional Islamic law prescribes the death penalty. Foda’s countryman, the Nobel Prizewinning novelist Naguib Mahfouz, was stabbed in 1994 after accusations of blasphemy. Under Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, many non-Muslims have been arrested, tortured, and sentenced to die on the slimmest of evidence.

But for such things to happen in Iran and Egypt, two countries where Islamic radicalism is widespread, is one thing; to have them happen in Oslo and Mississauga, Ontario is quite another. But this kind of thing has happened before in the West. On November 2, 2004, Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh was bicycling through the streets of Amsterdam when Mohammed Bouyeri, a Muslim wearing traditional Islamic clothing, began shooting at him. After Van Gogh fell off his bike, Bouyeri ran up to him and began slitting his throat, attempting to behead him. In his agony, van Gogh pleaded with his killer, “Can’t we talk about this?” Bouyeri replied by stabbing van Gogh repeatedly and leaving a note on a knife stabbed into the body. The note contained verses from the Qur’an and threats to other Dutch public figures who opposed the flood of Muslim immigrants into the Netherlands.

Bouyeri killed van Gogh because of the filmmaker’s twelve-minute video Submission, which had aired on Dutch TV a few weeks before the murder. A collaboration between van Gogh and the Somali ex-Muslim Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who was then a member of the Dutch Parliament, Submission decried the mistreatment of Muslim women — and even featured images of battered women wearing see-through robes that exposed their breasts, with verses from the Qur’an written on their bodies.

At his trial, Bouyeri was unrepentant -- and absolutely clear about why he murdered van Gogh. “I did what I did purely out my beliefs,” he explained, Qur’an in hand. “I want you to know that I acted out of conviction and not that I took his life because he was Dutch or because I was Moroccan and felt insulted….If I ever get free, I would do it again.” He was, he said, acting in accord with Islamic law: “What moved me to do what I did was purely my faith. I was motivated by the law that commands me to cut off the head of anyone who insults Allah and his prophet.”

The attacks on Kadra and Faizi show that there are many others in the West today who believe that they must likewise act upon Allah’s commands and victimize those whom they deem to have offended Islam.

This is a challenge to all Western governments, for it is a challenge to the freedom of speech that is rooted in the constitutions and laws of Western states, and ultimately is intimately connected with the freedom of conscience and the Judeo-Christian view of the dignity of the human being before God. Western leaders should move now to make it abundantly clear that attacks on “blasphemers” and “heretics” will not be tolerated; that those who believe that Sharia should be the highest law of the land are not welcome here; and that the West will defend our Judeo-Christian culture and heritage.

Otherwise, only one thing is certain: there will be many, many more such attacks.

Click Here to support Frontpagemag.com.

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Dr. Richard N. Frye

Dear readers:

The below is a weblink to one American Scholar in field of Iran. Kindly click on below weblink.

Sepas/Thank you.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2107592064891647273

Islam and the Presidency in Turkey

By ANDREW PURVIS

Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul speaks in front of a giant Turkish flag in Ankara, Turkey April 25, 2007.

In Turkey, the choosing of a president is rarely the dramatic affair that it is in the United States. Turkey's president isn't even directly elected by the voters — he or she is chosen by the elected parliament — and the office carries limited powers. Still, the president does have the power to veto legislation, and is also considered an important symbol of the Turkish state. That's why the nomination for president this week by Turkey's ruling party of the country's Foreign Minister, Abdullah Gul, has reopened fierce debates about the place of Islam in the ferociously secular Turkish state.
Gul, 54, is an affable moderate and one of friendliest faces of the political party that has dominated Turkey's parliament for the past five years. But like most senior officials of his Justice and Development Party, or AKP, his roots are in an Islamic grouping that was banned in Turkey in the 1990s. His Arabic is better than his English, as secular Turks like to point out. And his wife wears a traditional Islamic headscarf. (In fact, she petitioned the European Court of Human Rights to declare unconstitutional Turkey's law banning headscarves in public buildings, although she later dropped the case.) If her husband is confirmed, Mrs. Gul would be the only Turkish First Lady ever to cover her hair in this way. By contrast, the incumbent, President Ahmet Necdet Sezer, a former judge and staunch secularist, has routinely wielded his veto to block AKP initiatives he deemed too Islamist.
Gul's election — parliament is to vote for a president in the coming weeks — would also give the ruling AKP control of Turkey's three top political posts: the Presidency, the Prime Minister's office and the Speaker of the Parliament. (In parliamentary elections later this year , the AKP is expected to be returned to power, albeit with a reduced mandate). The election to all three top positions of officials who "come from the same Islamic-rooted tree," writes columnist Metin Munir in the leading secularist daily Milliyet, augurs "the end of Turkey as we know it. "Turkey, he warned, is about to enter "a period of Islamicizing and conservatism: It is hard to tell where it will end."
Such fears may be exaggerated, however, since Turkey's institutions have potent safeguards against the introduction of political Islam. And the powerful Turkish military, self-appointed guardians of the secularist state, stands ready to intervene should those safeguards be breached. (It did so a decade ago by removing Gul's former party from government.) The AKP has so far been reluctant to introduce any changes that might provoke the wrath of the generals. At a rare press conference prior to this week's nomination of Gul, the hawkish army chief Yasar Buyukanit warned that a Turkish President must have secular values, "not only in words, but in essence."
The secularist backlash has already made itself felt: Gul is his party's second choice for president; for several months it has been assumed that the AKP's nomination would go to current Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose Islamist roots are more pronounced than Gul's, and who is widely distrusted by the Turkish military and secular establishment. At a huge secularist rally last weekend in Ankara, at least 300,000 people turned out to oppose Erdogan's candidacy, some saying they would prefer military rule to him being president. The AKP appears to have noted the warning.
Gul's selection removes a key institutional check on his party's agenda, which is likely to increase friction with the military. The choice also represents a broader shift in political power away from the secularist elite in Turkey's coastal cities and towards the conservative Islamic heartland. Gul himself hails from Central Anatolia, the Turkish equivalent of America's Bible Belt. His party's ascendance over the past five years poses a clear challenge not only to the military, but to Turkey's old secular establishment. It's a challenge based on a democratic mandate from the electorate. But in a country where the military retains an implicit veto over the actions of the democratically elected politicians, it remains to be seen how far the balance will be tipped.

The Iranian Clerics Assets in Canada

Dear Honorable Peter MacKay:

On Wednesday April 25th, 2007 BBC reported that “on Monday, the EU agreed a total arms embargo, and added further people to the travel ban list - they are banned from the EU and their assets are frozen”[1]. I would like to know like any other Canadian citizen in Canada , has Canada freeze the Islamic Republic of Iran, and Rafsanjani’s assets in Canada ?
Last, in past, I asked Honorable Peter MacKay please update Canadians on matter of Dr. Ramin JAHANBEGLOO’s fate, and still waiting for response from Honorable Peter MacKay.
Thank you,
Kind regards

[1] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6590899.stm

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Anti-terror raids net 6 suspects

LONDON, England (CNN) -- British anti-terror police backed by local authorities arrested six people Tuesday in a series of raids, the Metropolitan Police said in a statement.
The suspects were arrested "in connection with inciting others to commit acts of terrorism overseas and terrorist fund raising."
"The men were arrested this morning by officers from the Met's Counter Terrorism Command, supported by local officers, at five addresses in London and one in Luton," the statement said.
Luton is located north of London. All six were arrested under Britain's Terrorism Act and are being held at a central London police station, according to Scotland Yard.
Police said searches are being carried out at a number of locations.
"The arrests form part of a long-term pro-active and complex investigation into alleged incitement and radicalization for the purposes of terrorism, as well as alleged provision of financial support for international terrorism," the statement said.

Street Justice is Legal in Iran


Group cleared over Iran murders
By Frances Harrison BBC News, Tehran
Iran's Supreme Court has acquitted a group of men charged over a series of gruesome killings in 2002, according to lawyers for the victims' families.
The vigilantes were not guilty because their victims were involved in un-Islamic activities, the court found.
The killers said they believed Islam let them spill the blood of anyone engaged in illicit activities if they issued two warnings to the victims.
The serial killings took place in 2002 in the south-eastern city of Kerman.
'Morally corrupt'
The case raises serious questions about vigilantes in Iran taking justice into their own hands and undermining the rule of law.
Up to 18 people were killed in just one year, but only five of the murders were tried in court.
According to their confessions, the killers put some of their victims in pits and stoned them to death. Others were suffocated. One man was even buried alive while others had their bodies dumped in the desert to be eaten by wild animals.
The accused, who were all members of an Islamic paramilitary force, told the court their understanding of the teachings of one Islamic cleric allowed them to kill immoral people if they had ignored two warnings to stop their bad behaviour.
But there was no judicial process to determine the guilt of the victims in these cases.
The group even killed a young couple they thought were involved in sex outside marriage, but media reports say the couple were either married or engaged to be married.
Lawyers for the victims' families say the Supreme Court has five times overturned the verdict of a lower court that found all the men guilty of murder.
Now the Supreme Court is reported to have acquitted all the killers of the charge of murder on the grounds that their victims were all morally corrupt.
Some of the group may, however, face prison sentences or have to pay financial compensation to their victims' families.
Story from BBC NEWS:http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/6557679.stmPublished: 2007/04/15 16:16:54 GMT© BBC MMVII

Thursday, April 19, 2007

West was defeated to the IRI, despite UN confirmation that the IRI is in progress of nuclear proliferation

Article One:
April 19, 2007, 5:13PMReid: U.S. can't win the war in Iraq

By ANNE FLAHERTY Associated Press Writer © 2007 The Associated Press
TOOLS

WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday the war in Iraq is "lost," triggering an angry backlash by Republicans who said the top Democrat had turned his back on the troops.

The bleak assessment was the sharpest yet from Reid, who has vowed to send President Bush legislation calling for combat to end next year. Reid said he told Bush on Wednesday that he thought the war could not be won through military force and only through political, economic and diplomatic means.
"I believe myself that the secretary of state, secretary of defense and — you have to make your own decisions as to what the president knows — (know) this war is lost and the surge is not accomplishing anything as indicated by the extreme violence in Iraq yesterday," said Reid, D-Nev.
Republicans pounced on the comment as evidence, they said, that Democrats do not support the troops.
"I can't begin to imagine how our troops in the field, who are risking their lives every day, are going to react when they get back to base and hear that the Democrat leader of the United States Senate has declared the war is lost," said Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.
The exchange came as the House headed toward a vote Thursday on whether to demand that troops leave Iraq next year. Last month, the House passed legislation that funded the war in Iraq but ordered combat missions to end by September 2008. The Senate passed similar, less-sweeping legislation that would set a nonbinding goal of bringing combat troops home by March 31, 2008.
Bush said he would veto either measure and warned that troops are being harmed by Congress' failure to deliver the funds quickly.
The Pentagon says it has enough money to pay for the Iraq war through June. The Army is taking "prudent measures" aimed at ensuring that delays in the bill financing the war do not harm troop readiness, according to instructions sent to Army commanders and budget officials April 14.
While $70 billion that Congress provided in September for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan has mostly run out, the Army has told department officials to slow the purchase of nonessential repair parts and other supplies, restrict the use of government charge cards, and limit travel.
The Army also will delay contracts for facilities repair and environmental restoration, according to instructions from Army Comptroller Nelson Ford. He said the accounting moves are similar to those enacted last year when the Republican-led Congress did not deliver a war funding bill to Bush until mid-June.
More stringent steps would be taken in May, such as a hiring freeze and firing temporary employees, but exceptions are made for any war-related activities or anything that "would result immediately in the degradation of readiness standards" for troops in Iraq or those slated for deployment.
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino called the Democrat's stance "disturbing" and all but dared Reid to cut off funding for the war.
"If this is his true feeling, then it makes one wonder if he has the courage of his convictions and therefore will decide to defund the war," she said.
Reid has left that possibility open. The majority leader supports separate legislation that would cut off funding for combat missions after March 2008. The proposal would allow money spent on
such efforts as counterterrorism efforts and training Iraqi security forces.
Reid and other Democrats were initially reluctant to discuss such draconian measures to end the war, but no longer.
"I'm not sure much is impossible legislatively," Reid said Thursday. "The American people have indicated . . . that they are fed up with what's going on."
___
Associated Press writer Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.
Article Two:
US: Iranians Aid Iraqi Sunni Car Bombers
By Al Pessin Pentagon19 April 2007

A senior U.S. military officer says a renewed effort to break suicide bomb networks in Iraq has led, at least in part, to Iranian intelligence services. The statement came at the Pentagon Thursday, as U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates was visiting Baghdad on the day on a day of continued bombings, after a particularly deadly series of bombings Wednesday. VOA's Al Pessin reports from the Pentagon.
At a Pentagon briefing, Major General Michael Barbero said Iran shares the goals of the Sunni insurgents, to destabilize Iraq and tie down U.S. forces. He said that appears to be the reason Iran is now helping the Sunni groups, as well as Shi'ite extremists.
Major General Michael Barbero"We are seeing some aid from the Iranian intelligence services to the Sunni insurgents," he said. "Detainees in American custody have indicated that Iranian intelligence operatives have given support to Sunni insurgents. And then we've discovered some munitions in Baghdad neighborhoods which are largely Sunni that were manufactured in Iran."
General Barbero, who is on the senior military staff, says U.S. forces have been focusing for some time on the networks that send out suicide bombers with huge bombs in their cars and trucks, such as those who struck Wednesday killing, according to the U.S. military, 150 Iraqi civilians. The U.S. military calls the large bombs, which mostly target Shi'ite neighborhoods Vehicle-Borne Improvised Explosive Devices (VBIED).
"We've had a renewed focus on what we call 'the accelerants' for sectarian violence," he added. "And we've had success, some success with the extra-judicial killings. The murder rates are down. We've had some success with these VBIED networks. So it is a priority. And it has been a focus since before the start of this operation."
On Wednesday, Admiral William Fallon, the U.S. military officer commanding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, called the vehicle bombs the most important issue for his forces to address because their aim is to foment sectarian violence.
The bombings continued Thursday, with at least 12 people reported killed in one incident in Baghdad, less than a kilometer from the home of Iraq's president. Two Iraqi soldiers were among the dead, and coalition military officials reported two British soldiers were killed in a bombing in southern Iraq.
In a speech, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said the insurgents are "targeting humanity," and that his government is engaged in what he called "an open battle…for the sake of the nation, dignity, honor and the people."
Also on Thursday, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, General David Petraeus, said the Wednesday bombings were a setback that came just as he thought the new Baghdad Security Plan was starting to take hold.
Lt. Gen. David Petraeus"A day like that can have a real psychological impact," said General Petraeus. "And it came at a time where, frankly, [Lieutenant] General [Ray] Odierno [his deputy] and I, and a lot of the other leaders in Baghdad and throughout Iraq, have felt that we were getting a bit of traction. You know it's very, it's almost imperceptible at times, but that there was slow progress with the Baghdad security plan and in some other parts of the country as well."
General Petraeus said Iraqi and coalition leaders are taking action to respond to the challenge posed by the recent series of large-scale bombings.
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates in suit at Camp Falluja, IraqThe general spoke during a visit by Defense Secretary Robert Gates and some of the top U.S. military officers. Secretary Gates says he will press Iraqi leaders to make faster progress on reconciliation between the Sunni and Shi'ite communities, which U.S. officials believe is the key to long-term stability in Iraq.
At the Pentagon briefing, General Barbero said there has been some success in easing some types of violence in recent weeks, including a drop in sectarian murders and in the overall number of attacks on civilians in Baghdad and elsewhere. But he said those successes, like the continuing bombings, are just part of the story.
"We have to take a longer term view of this and not take a successful day and blow that out of proportion or take one of these tragic days like we had yesterday [Wednesday] and extrapolate that into a trend," said General Barbero.
In Iraq, General Petraeus said all the U.S. troops involved in the current surge of forces will not be in place until mid-June, and it will take some time after that to see the full impact of the security plan. Secretary Gates said how long the higher number of troops will stay will depend on progress in the security and political efforts.
Article Three:

Iran ‘months’ away from next nuclear phase
By Daniel Dombey in Brussels

Published: April 19 2007 09:48 Last updated: April 19 2007 16:45
Iran is a “matter of months” away from completing the next phase of its nuclear programme, diplomats said on Thursday, in response to a leaked letter from the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations nuclear watchdog.
The letter, written by Olli Heinonen, IAEA deputy director general, indicates that Iran has installed up to 1,312 centrifuges at a facility in Natanz and is using them to enrich uranium - a process that could produce both nuclear fuel and weapons grade material.
“This certainly demonstrates complete defiance of the United Nations Security Council,” said a western diplomat, referring to a series of Security Council resolutions demanding that Tehran cease uranium enrichment. “It shows they are going full speed ahead.”
Iran, which insists its purposes are peaceful, is currently proceeding with plans to install 3,000 centrifuges – which in theory could produce enough uranium for a weapon within a year. But in practice, it could take many times that long to produce enough weapons material, and it would take still longer to engineer a bomb.
In February, Tehran told the IAEA that it had installed the first two 164-centrifuge “cascades” of the system and had nearly completed another two.
Mr Heinonen’s letter, dated April 18, said that Tehran had now installed eight cascades and had begun putting feedstock into them. Diplomats estimated this meant that Iran could expect to install all 3,000 centrifuges in “a matter of months” – in another three or four months.
In February, Mohamed ElBaradei, IAEA director general, told the Financial Times that Tehran could install 3,000 centrifuges in six months to a year from that time.
“Where they are now is where you would expect them to be now in installing these machines, but it still leaves significant questions to what the capability is,” said a European official. “We don’t know how many machines they actually have and we don’t know how well they’re operating.”
Diplomats added that Mr Heinonen’s letter was partly intended to inform IAEA governments of the true status of Iran’s programme in the wake of claims last week by Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, Iran’s president, that the country had reached “industrial” capacity. The letter also censured Tehran for limiting IAEA access to its facilities.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

CAIR’s Grievance Theater, the Flying Imams and 9/11

By Patrick PooleFrontPageMagazine.com April 18, 2007It’s a tale of two Novembers with the horror of September 11th sandwiched in between.

In November 2006, six imams on a US Airways Minneapolis to Phoenix flight begin engaging in bizarre behaviors eerily similar to those used by the 9/11 hijackers to takeover the planes used on that terrible day: shouting slogans in Arabic; leaving assigned seats to position themselves much like the 9/11 attackers; requesting seat belt extenders that they positioned on the floor, rather than used to secure themselves. Responding to the reasonable concerns of passengers and the flight crew, the imams were removed from the plane by authorities.

Seven years earlier in November 1999, two Saudi students on an America West flight from Phoenix to Columbus were detained after landing because they had made repeated attempts to enter the cockpit area of the plane during the flight.

In both cases, CAIR rose up to defend the offenders in question and engaged in their now standard grievance theater protest politics. In the most recent case, CAIR has tried to capitalize on the publicity surrounding the incident by backing the "Flying Imams" and supporting their lawsuit against the airlines and passengers for responding to their bizarre behavior. The lawsuit is being handled by a Muslim attorney associated with CAIR.

When it comes to the November 1999 incident, any mention of CAIR’s involvement or defense of the Saudi students has been scrubbed from the organization’s website. It’s no wonder, as the 9/11 Commission Report (page 521, footnote 60) explains that the FBI now considers the incident as a “dry run” for the 9/11 hijackings. And the two men involved? As the 9/11 Commission Report explains, Hamdan al-Shalawi was in Afghanistan in November 2000 training at an Al-Qaeda camp to launch “Khobar Tower”-type attacks against the US in Saudi Arabia, and Mohammad Al-Qadhaieen was arrested in June 2003 as a material witness in the 9/11 attacks. Both men were friends of Al-Qaeda recruiter, Zakaria Mustapha Soubra, who drove them to the airport that day in Qadhaieen’s car. Another friend of Shalawi is Ghassan al-Sharbi, another Al-Qaeda operative that would later be captured in Pakistan with high-level Al-Qaeda leader Abu Zubaida.

There is a connection between these two incidents, as the leader of the six “Flying Imams” this past November is none other than Omar Shahin, the former imam of the Islamic Center of Tucson, where the two Saudi students from the November 1999 incident attended. Counterterrorism expert Rita Katz told the Washington Post in September 2002 that the mosque served as “basically the first cell of Al-Qaeda in the United States; that is where it all started”. (Len Sherman’s Arizona Monthly November 2004 article, “Al Qaeda among Us”, provides greater detail about the connections between the Saudi pair involved in the November 1999 event and the Al-Qaeda cell that operated in Tucson and Phoenix.)

Their current silence and website purge notwithstanding, immediately after the November 1999 “dry run”, CAIR was not shy about publicly speaking on the incident. “It seems like they single out some individuals because of their name, the way they look or their national origin,” huffed current CAIR National Vice Chairman Ahmad Al-Akhras (who was then president of the CAIR Ohio chapter) in an interview with the Egyptian daily, Al-Ahram. That same article quoted Nihad Awad, Executive Director and Co-Founder of CAIR, who explained, “the hysteria around [the crash of] EgyptAir [Flight 990] has created a negative atmosphere that leads to such incidents.”

CAIR not only gave indirect support to the 9/11 “dry run” hijackers by launching an aggressive media defense and circulating their woeful tale of innocents victimized by the bigotry of non-Muslims, but as Katherine Kersten of the Minneapolis Star Tribune reminds us, in 2000 CAIR fronted a lawsuit for Shalawi and Qadhaieen against America West by hiring attorneys and calling for a boycott of the airline as a result of the incident. Again, two identical events eight years apart with CAIR playing the exact same role.

CAIR was unsuccessful in the lawsuit stemming from the November 1999 9/11 “dry run”, as the judge quickly dismissed the case, but they did succeed in creating an atmosphere of intimidation that was certainly aimed at stopping airline passengers from speaking up about suspicious behavior. Did CAIR’s campaign of intimidation silence any of the passengers aboard United Airlines Flight 175, American Airlines Flight 11, American Airlines Flight 77, or United Airlines Flight 93 who might have witnessed suspicious behavior of the 9/11 hijackers that day? Since all the passengers of those flights were silenced forever, we will never know.

But the horrific consequences of their previous defense of the 9/11 “dry run” has not prevented CAIR from using the exact same tactics and rhetoric in the current “Flying Imams” case. As Janet Levy recently explained in an article here at FrontPage (“The Minneapolis Six Sabotage Airline Security”), the CAIR-backed lawsuit by the six imams is being used as a propaganda device to advance CAIR’s legislative agenda for the passage of a bill through Congress that would prevent authorities from acting on suspicious behavior, much like what was seen in the November 1999 and November 2006 incidents, as well as 9/11.

As their current protest politics in the “Flying Imams” case demonstrates, CAIR shows no remorse for their complicity in providing cover for the 9/11 “dry run” operatives, though the purge of their website of any mention of their participation was clearly an attempt to try to wipe the public record clean of their involvement. But in light of their past actions and with their pursuit of the current lawsuit, it seems fair to ask: will thousands more Americans need to be murdered before CAIR brings the curtain down on their grievance theater road show? Tragically, we might have the opportunity to find out.

Click Here to support Frontpagemag.com.

Documentry about Iran

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-KdFMuo3vo&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmihanyar%2Eblogspot%2Ecom%2F

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-cqr7dMEP4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKN-gZuSH2o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkC-PYnm9lA

Canada needs to reconsider its position on the IRI

Dear Right Honorable Prime Minister Stephen HARPER:

The below are weblinks to two documentry video clips which illustrates kidnapping by the IRI and Iranian people are demanding justice.


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5510072894320301873


http://azadibayan.ning.com/video/video/show?id=665135%3AVideo%3A242

Now, a person begins to wonder why Canada is willing to have an amicable relation with the IRI? This IRI from one hand is attacking at Canadian Arm Forces in Afghanistan, and from another hand the IRI is murdering innocent people in Iran. How can anyone justify the IRI's burtality? How can anyone shake hand with evil in Iran and for a second would think that Canada will be safe from harm? No one is safe.

Thank you,

Kind regards

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Iran-made weapons for Taliban are seized

It's the first sign that the nation has a role in Afghan war
By PETER SPIEGELLos Angeles Times


ATTACK A powerful remote-controlled bomb destroyed a U.N. vehicle in southern Afghanistan's main city on Tuesday, killing four Nepalese guards and an Afghan driver, officials said.

The attack on a three-vehicle U.N. convoy in Kandahar was the bloodiest in Afghanistan for the world body since the Taliban's 2001 ouster.

Associated Press -->
WASHINGTON — U.S.-led coalition forces in southern Afghanistan recently intercepted Iranian-made weapons that were being shipped to fighters for the Taliban, historically regional rivals of Tehran, the Pentagon's top general said Tuesday.

Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the munitions, which included mortars and C-4 explosives, were captured within the past month near Kandahar, which serves as the military and administrative capital for the restive south. That region has been under renewed Taliban assault in recent months.

The Bush administration repeatedly has accused Iran of supplying insurgents in Iraq with sophisticated weaponry. Pace's remarks were the first by a senior U.S. official to indicate similar activities in Afghani-stan.

Exact source unclearPace said it remained unclear who shipped the arms, but that markings on the explosives enabled U.S. intelligence to identify them as Iranian-made. "It is not as clear in Afghani-stan which Iranian entity is responsible," Pace said. In Iraq, U.S. officials have accused the Quds Force, the international arm of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, but have said it remained unclear whether Quds operatives were acting at the behest of senior Iranian officials in Tehran.
The Bush administration has acknowledged that Iran has been active inside Afghanistan, but officials have described the influence as benign.

Historically, the Shiite Muslim government in Tehran has viewed the Taliban as archrivals and nearly went to war with the Sunni-dominated Taliban in 1998, when the Kabul government captured and killed dozens of Iranians in the northern city of Mazar-e-Sharif during a rebellion.

Israel's Next War

By P. David HornikFrontPageMagazine.com April 17, 2007

Ze’ev Schiff—left-of-center, not a hawk, and considered by many to be Israel’s foremost military analyst—cites security sources as saying those Qassams that Islamic Jihad has been raining on Gaza-bordering communities during the “ceasefire” with Hamas are in fact supplied by Hamas.

Hamas, the sources said, while “maintaining a front of abiding by the ceasefire,” is actually “emerging as the lynchpin of Palestinian terrorist activities against Israel.” That is believed to include providing Islamic Jihad with Russian-made 16-kilometer-range Grad rockets, already used last year to target the town of Ashkelon with its strategic facilities.

An analysis last month already warned that Hamas is “improving its rocket capabilities” while “seeking to build anti-tank and anti-aircraft systems that will neutralize Israel’s current ability to easily penetrate Gaza.”

The deteriorating situation in the south led Brig.-Gen. (ret.) Tzvika Fogel, formerly chief of staff for Southern Command, to warn on Israel’s Channel 10 that Israel faces two choices: to “continue its ostrich-like stance” until the Gaza terror forces mount a surprise attack, or to launch a full-scale preemptive attack of its own.

Meanwhile, shifting the lens to the north, last week the head of Israeli Military Intelligence, Maj.-Gen. Amos Yadlin, reported to the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that Syria is “purchasing massive amounts of ground-to-ground and anti-tank missiles from Russia”—a country whose name tends to turn up in these contexts—and that, while “there is a low probability that Syria will initiate a war against Israel,” Syria could launch attacks in the Golan Heights even though it could lead to war.

Another report gave an even more ominous picture of an “unprecedented military buildup in Syria,” including the deployment of 300 home-manufactured Scud missiles just north of the Golan Heights, the establishment of new commando units, and a spike in training for urban and guerrilla warfare.

A source in IDF Northern Command said that “Syria saw the difficulty the IDF had during the fighting inside the southern Lebanese villages [last summer] and now . . . wants to draw us—in the event of a war—into battles in built-up areas where they think they will have the upper hand.”

And over in Lebanon itself, the fallout from last summer’s war is just as negative and the prognosis no better. In his same testimony to the Knesset committee last week, Maj.-Gen. Yadlin noted that up to several hundred Al Qaeda members have arrived in Lebanon with the aim of attacking UNIFIL and other Western targets; and that Hezbollah remains entrenched in southern Lebanon and keeps amassing large quantities of arms from Syria and Iran.

Rounding out the circle by returning to the south, Yadlin also said some Al Qaeda operatives have infiltrated Gaza as well, and that Hamas is gaining financial and political strength while its members receive training in Syria and Iran.

Overall, “the MI chief stressed that Iran continues to provide funding and weapons to Syria, Hamas, and Hezbollah, and has close military and intelligence coordination with Syria.” Add Russia to the mix and the picture is complete: a Shiite-Sunni-Russian terror-military axis seeking to surround, pressure, and harass Israel and ultimately eradicate it.

Tragically, this is happening at a time when Israel has a government hobbled by incompetence, unpopularity, scandals, infighting, and delusory dovishness, and that, apart from stepped-up training for some IDF units, is essentially doing nothing about the growing threats. It does not help that Israel’s U.S. ally keeps obsessively choreographing diplomatic dances with the likes of PA chairman Mahmoud Abbas, the Saudis, and the Arab League with which Israel dutifully complies—achieving nothing except to further project weakness to Israel’s enemies and lull the parts of the Israeli public that are eager to be lulled.

As Schiff points out in another analysis, it was the reluctance to enter a two-front war that led Israel to allow Hezbollah’s major military buildup in southern Lebanon in the first place. After Israel pulled out of southern Lebanon in 2000 against the advice of most of the IDF top brass, Prime Minister Ehud Barak and then Prime Minister Ariel Sharon found themselves facing a Palestinian terror onslaught mounted from the West Bank and Gaza and did not want to further complicate matters by doing something about Hezbollah in Lebanon.

So Israel, Schiff notes, “never once struck at the convoys transferring the missiles to Lebanon, and never struck even one Hezbollah missile warehouse, or even the short-range rockets near the border.” The end result was that Israel found itself at war on two fronts anyway—when Hamas attacked from Gaza and kidnapped a soldier last June, and Hezbollah followed suit the next month with an attack and kidnapping from Lebanon; and now faces the prospect of a further two-front war against enemies with enhanced capabilities.

Hope resides mainly in the interim report later this month of the Winograd Committee, set up to investigate the failures in last summer’s war and also expected to address the whole period of 2000-2006. Sufficiently harsh conclusions against Prime Minister Ehud Olmert could lead him to resign or cause other political ferment leading to new elections. As time goes on and Israel, aside from antiterror policing work in the West Bank, remains almost entirely passive against the growing threats, it does not appear that Olmert’s government has the will or ability to do anything about them, and its continued tenure appears to spell disaster.

If there is a chance—apart from a strike on Iran that would alter the region’s strategic balance—for Israel to avoid another two-front entanglement, it lies mainly in regaining its deterrence by making an effective move in Gaza. A hard-enough blow to Hamas and its friends there could make Hezbollah and Syria think twice about starting more trouble in the north. But there may be little time left, and such an outcome requires a functioning government in Jerusalem. It also calls for a Washington able to look past short-term diplomatic concerns and give Israel the backing it needs.

Click Here to support Frontpagemag.com.

It's The Oil, Stupid

By Victor Davis HansonThe Washington Times April 16, 2007

It is usually silly to offer a single solution to complex problems. But it's hard not to when looking at the serial savagery in Iran and the Arab world.
Oil -- the huge profits it provides and the insidious influence it gives those selling it -- explains most of the world's worries over the Middle East.

No, that does not mean the United States is fighting in Iraq to get control of its petroleum. For all the charges of "No blood for oil," the American occupation has neither been able to reverse a decline in oil production in Iraq nor alleviate skyrocketing oil prices worldwide. And, recently, the first new contracts of the now-transparent Iraqi oil ministry went to non-American companies.

What it does mean, though, is that the vast, imported petroleum needs of the West, India and China, and the resulting huge profits that pour into oil-exporting states, have super-sized the Middle East's problems.

Much of the Islamic world is struggling to come to grips with modernity and globalization. While the West pays little attention to disenchanted Muslims in India, Indochina or Malaysia, we focus our attention on Iranian and Arab radicals. They alone, thanks to oil, have the cash to fund jihadists and hate-filled madrassas.

The Palestinian problem is illustrative. Since Israel's occupation of land taken after the 1967 war, much of the world has seen this issue as a threat to regional and global peace.

Such old territorial disputes are, of course, common -- and go relatively unnoticed -- throughout the world. Japan's Kurile Islands are still held by Russia. Tibet has been absorbed by China. Nuclear Pakistan and nuclear India fight over Kashmir. The list goes on.

Yet it's the anger over the tiny West Bank that in the past caused the Arab patrons of the Palestinians to embargo oil to the West and create long gas lines in Europe and America. As a result, a single suicide bomber from Jericho earns more press than anonymous thousands slaughtered in Darfur.

Today, terrorists operate from East Timor to Peru. But global anxiety has been continually focused on Middle Eastern terrorists, from the Palestinian assassins and hijackers of the 1970s to al Qaeda's suicide bombers. These killers alone have had the means to disrupt the Western way of life. Take away Hezbollah's Iranian petrodollars and it could never afford weapons and foot soldiers to slaughter Westerners in the Middle East and beyond.

An oil-rich Saddam Hussein was a threat only because he had purchased more military hardware than most European powers own -- and used it to attack oil-exporting neighbors in a bid to control more of the world's petroleum reserves.

In Iran, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is confident that powerful nations abroad will overlook his thuggery in hopes of getting a chance to buy his country's oil -- or in worry that any tension would send world prices even higher. Mr. Ahmadinejad also knows -- and fears -- that without supporting terrorists or trying to acquire a nuclear bomb he would be just another tinhorn loudmouth like Cuba's Fidel Castro or Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe.

Yet vast oil profits do little to help -- and probably much to harm -- Middle Eastern countries. Unlike in places where economic achievement is the result of savvy business leaders, a hardworking labor force and a literate public, tribal hierarchies in the Middle East simply metamorphosed into billion-dollar nations by virtue of sitting atop crude oil.

One result is a big inferiority complex in the Middle East. There is always the fear the gas and oil reserves will dry up, leaving a Libya, Iran or Saudi Arabia with as much global attention as a Chad or Bulgaria.

Another result is unstable societies. When nations acquire collective wealth gradually through their own industry, a middle class can arise. But in the Middle East, a few tribal and religious sects with oil are fabulously wealthy; almost everyone else is abjectly poor. Illegitimate monarchies and jittery dictatorships -- always in fear of coups, terrorists and revolutions -- depend upon oil-needy foreigners, trading scarce oil and endless petrodollars for export goods and protection.

If the U.S. could curb its voracious foreign oil purchases by using conservation, additional petroleum production, nuclear power, alternate fuels, coal gasification and new technologies, the world price might return to below $40 a barrel.

That decline would dry up the oil profits of those in the Middle East who now so desperately use them to ensure that their own problems must also be the world's.
Click Here to support Frontpagemag.com.