When Western Politicians Work With Terrorists

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R3BD7yjcEE&feature=relmfu
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mp4a03aBig&feature=player_embedded

Thou Shalt not Steal

There is one Christian Commandment which is against stealing from people, it is thou shall not steal. It is a grand idea that someone needs to remember it. 

When North African countries were going through regime change, Canadian government was freezing assets of  head of states of the North African countries, and would label them as a dictator. There was a question that if these head of states were dictators. Than, why did you let them have assets in Canada?  And now who possess those assets? 

Currently, there is no evidence which proves any assets is being transferred to people. There is a natural conclusion that these assets are owned by elite members of Canada, and there was a good Christian doctrine thou shall not steal.

The West is Bullying Muslims over Muhammad

The Western nations know that Muslim people are sensitive about Prophet Muhammad, and the Wester nations are using freedom of speech as scapegoat to insult Prophet Muhammad. The Muslim people begin by reacting with burning, and killing non-Muslims.

Than, there is the fake surprise face of the Western people that Muslims are uncivilized and there is no freedom of speech in the Muslim nations. Now, looking at other side of the coin, Muslim people do not disrespect Jesus or making any comment to Jesus which may offend Christian community. Yes, Muslims do attack at Christian communities, when Christians in the West start disrespecting their faith. The real question is why these Western nations are making cartoon and movies which are depicting Muhammad as a pervert or a bi/homosexual man? If someone in a movie theater begins to shout fire would authority apprehend her/him for an offence of mischief? Will authority in an airport apprehend a person who says bomb?

As a result, the social order of a society is more important than freedom of speech. Particularly, the Muslim nations are not doing anything against Jesus, it is the West which is agitating the Muslim community and it is acting as a bully against Muslims.

Let think independently, let not become pawn of politicians for their own bloodbath desire. Let live in peace with one another.

Military Strike On Nuclear Sites is Not An Option

The international community is disappointed with regard to the regime's nuclear program. There are some countries that they are contemplating to launch military strike on the nuclear sites in Iran. These countries are not violating any law. As a matter of fact, these countries are acting within United Nations Article 51 “Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.”¹ There are some other countries like Germany that it would like to impose more economic sanction against the regime in Iran and to resolve this nuclear issue base on dialogue of nations. It is following Peace Treaty of Westphalia.

Assuming one country like Israel to follow Article 51 of the United Nations, and launch a preemptive strike on nuclear sites of Iran. The above action would not secure existing of Israel and it would endanger existing of Israel. The regime in Iran would mobilize itself within several years and would launch terrorist strike on Israel and US interest around the world to ensure its security. If the nuclear blast would be a bad news for the world, the terrorist attacks against Israel and US would be way worst than the nuclear blast.

As a result, a preemptive military strike on the nuclear site in Iran would be fruitless. However, there is an alternative in ending in nuclear saga of Iran. Massive military deployment in Iran to topple the regime in Iran, as it happened in 2003, when US launched a military assault on Saddam Huyssien, and ended Saddam's regime. Last part, it would be the same tactic which is using now. Assisting dissidents within Iran to demolish the Islamic Republic of Iran.

1United Nations <http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter7.shtml> 21 Sept 2012

Pandora Box of Iran's Nuclear Proliferation

On July 01^st, 1968 the former establishment of Iran which was a monarchy system and head of state was Shah Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Recently, The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has brought it to the light that the regime in Iran's nuclear proliferation was in violation of the NPT.¹ Iran's nuclear energy head Mr. Fereydoun ABBASI-DAVANI (Douani) فریدون عباسی دوانی refuted the IAEA's claim, and charged the above agency being infiltrated by terrorist and saboteurs.²

 

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin NETANYAHU expressed serious concern with regard to the Iran's nuclear proliferation because it has direct impact on the state of Israel's survival in the region. Mr. Netanyahu has been persistent to use of military strike on Iran.³ However, German Chancellor Angela Merkel does not share same philosophy as Netanyahu, and believes in a political solution over the nuclear programs in Iran.⁴

The regime in Iran will not stop its nuclear proliferation, and learned a valuable lesson from former Libya president Qaddafi that by giving-up on nuclear proliferation, there was great possibility in this political realism to be overthrowing by foreign states. The regime in Iran has been very candid about its involvement in Syria. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corp General Mohammad Ali JAFARI who suppress uprising back in 2009 in Iran, he was assigned to provide advise to the regime in Syria to suppress the political unrest in the Syria.⁵

The bottom line, the nuclear programs in Iran is a means of survival, and any attack on the nuclear programs in Iran, it will be translated in a massive terrorist attack around the world against interest of the NATO or US and Israel Allies. The regime in Iran needs Shia state in Syria as an instrument to dominate the region, and would not allow the Syrian state to be overthrowing by the Western nations. Thus,  the political climate in the Middle East is moving toward political realism each day, and the region is becoming less stable for any peaceful means to create political liberalism in the region.

1National Post <http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/09/18/iaea-ignores-iranian-claim-it-has-been-infiltrated-by-terrorists-presses-islamic-republic-on-alleged-bomb-research/> 18 Sept 2012

2National Post <http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/09/18/iaea-ignores-iranian-claim-it-has-been-infiltrated-by-terrorists-presses-islamic-republic-on-alleged-bomb-research/> 18 Sept 2012

3The Gazette <http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Irans+nuke+chief+speak+155nation+atomic+agency+meet+Tehrans+atomic/7252131/story.html> 18 Sept 2012

4The Gazette <http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Irans+nuke+chief+speak+155nation+atomic+agency+meet+Tehrans+atomic/7252131/story.html> 18 Sept 2012

5The Wall Street <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443720204578000482831419570.html?mod=googlenews_wsj> 18 Sept 2012

Muhammad full movie - Innocence of Muslims