1.This author on prologue section page 1 claimed that in 1978 he was 24 years old young man and was on his way to India, as he had short stop in Iran, Tehran during Marshall laws. This author alleged that "the kamikaze taxi driver who drove me into Tehran from the airport that night taught me my first lesson: Iranians can't drive. The way he swoop and darted between the army patrols, I was …+ read more1.This author on prologue section page 1 claimed that in 1978 he was 24 years old young man and was on his way to India, as he had short stop in Iran, Tehran during Marshall laws. This author alleged that "the kamikaze taxi driver who drove me into Tehran from the airport that night taught me my first lesson: Iranians can't drive. The way he swoop and darted between the army patrols, I was convinced he was trying to draw fire. And was it legal to drive down the sidewalk to get around traffic?" Input: This sidewalk needed to be wide enough as well as accessible for a moving vehicle to drive on it because there is a big gap between road and sidewalk, and the author's statement would be impossible to do so since there is no such a sidewalk in Iran.
2.This author on page 55 alleged that "in October 2000, Ayatollah Khamenei, Ayatollah Khomeini's successor as supreme leader-the only real executive power in Iran-made it clear what the victory in Lebanon meant for Iran. It was during a secret address to Iran's National Security Council. After the usual long preamble, larded with quotations from the Koran, Khamenei put both hands on the conference table." Input: Since he is an intelligent officer, he is required due to nature of his work to be detail orient, and should know that Khamenei's right hand is immobile. As a result, there are cloud of doubts looming on the book as how truthful is this author with his readers.
This author contradicts himself on major points as follow.
1.This author on page 10 asserted that "and it wasn't as if the Iranian government could not close down the opium dens if it wanted to. Iran is a police state. Every day I drove around Tehran, or walked around the streets and bazaars, I was stopped and my papers checked." On page 77 this author claimed that "Iran is not a totalitarian state run by "Islamofascists" who believe they're in some quixotic war with the West." Input: Police state and totalitarian state shared same meaning as a state controls every fabric of a society, as this author experienced in Iran under rule of the mullah in Iran.
2.This author on page 207 claimed that "since 9/11, without any evidence, these people have tried to make the case that Muslims intend to infiltrate the United States, bring down from inside, and convert us to Islam." On page 230-231 this author was talking with Muhammad British-Pakistani born who made a remark about 7/7 which was the way to go and "accept Allah's law," he said. "End of story. Accept Allah's law and I think you'll have a peaceful life." In other words, we either convert to Islam or die." Input: There is a reality that Muslims are planning to convert Western nations to Islam or they have to die.
Author's theory frame work for the cleric regime in Iran:
1.This author was working on theory of green belt or green crescent which was orchestra by former democrat president Jimmy Carter to contain communism in the region. As this author claimed that the cleric regime in Iran has infiltrated in Afghanistan, Lebanon, Palestine and Iraq and the regime in Iran was in charge of the situation in the region. Also, Turkey was under spill of the regime too but not as strongly as other region. As a result, the cleric regime in Iran is a superpower. This author lacked understanding the term superpower which means a state is in leading position in the international system and has ability to influence on international events. Current regime in Iran is not able to control international event, and has been struggling about its nuclear programs. The regime in Iran is not a great power either which would have economic, military, diplomatic and cultural strength. The current regime in Iran is a rouge state, which is an authoritarian regime, absent of human rights, and seeking weapon of mass destruction.
2.This author was claiming that the regime in Iran is no longer relying on terrorism to advance its interest. However, the cleric regime has been targeting Iranian dissidents and have been murdering them around the world.
3.This author on page 15 claimed that the US do not understand the regime in Iran because of Iranian dissidents are lobbying the White House and the White House does not have clear understanding of Iran. According to the record, so far element of the cleric regime on individual base or as a council like National Iranian American Council had opportunity to meet senior staffs and elected politicians, and to mislead the White House and not Iranian dissidents.
4.This author is working on fear tactic that price of oil on rise and on page 198 this author says it is in best interest of the US to negotiate with the regime in Iran. However, he does not provide any information or strategy how to negotiate with the regime in Iran.
Author was bias toward Iran:
1.On page 9, this author claimed that there was no moral police officers in Iran. However, the regime has moral police officers who are enforcing Islamic dress code in Iran
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Our Man In Tehran by Robert Wright
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFO4RuL-KYU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33o9U7DtEy8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwWCS88UfG8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl9_t3UjetM
1.
On page 8 this author stated the shah had indeed married the girl, Gilda Soufi... Ottawa obliged. Not even the KGB knew that the shah had taken a fourth wife." According to historical fact, King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI married three times, and at each time of his marriage, there was monogamy relationship. Thus, this author's claim that the King was involved in a polygamy relationship was false. In addition, this author was reverberating the theocratic regime's propaganda in Iran that the King had a mistress. After careful consideration, this author left a taste that he has a connection with the regime in Iran.
2.
On page 17, this author put a great leverage on 1953 coup which was orchestrated by the US. According to CIA documents, it did not take part in 1953 coup in Iran, the below weblink would shed lights on 1953 coup in Iran.
3.
http://iranzamin2529.blogspot.com/2009/04/1953-coup-detat-in-iran.html
4.
On page 21, this author mentioned that the King called himself, King of Kings or Shahanshah, Light of Aryan. As a matter of fact, it was part of Iran's political culture to refer to all Iranian/Persian monarchs as King of Kings. The Light of Aryan title was given to Him by academic arena. The King also had another title, Great Chief and Commander of of Imperial Army.
5.
On several pages, this author mentioned that SAVAK agents had torture machines in their homes. The above allegation emerged on the surface after victory of 1979 Revolution in Iran. After careful consideration, the above allegation had no merit. First, victims would be in pain and would be making loud noises, so neighbors would know that there were problems. Last, this author claimed that there were victims body parts. Obviously, these places would cause staunch. Currently, there are SAVAK agents all over the world, and none ever brought international courts.
6.
This author mentioned several times about armories were present in the streets. Indeed, in 1970's, Quebec wanted to separate from rest of Canada, and there were individuals that they engaged in terrorist activities. There were marshal laws in place, and absent of civil liberty. Of course, in the above case, the end justify the meaning. However, in case of Pahlavi, it would be constituted as brutality.
7.
On page 50, this author needed to read General Robert Huyser's book " Mission to Tehran" that how he prevented the Imperial Iranian Armed Forces to stage a coup in Iran. In addition, he was puzzled why Carter's administration was forcing General Toufanian to buy more weapons from the US.
8.
This author illustrated bias toward 1979 revolution by calling former Generals with derogatory names while this author was praising the revolutionary people.
9.
This author had no firm grasp of Iran's 1979 Revolution because he was referring to King Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as Reza Pahlavi.
10.
There were plenty of grammar mistakes.
11.
This author also invented his own version of history by claiming that Khomeini's sons, Ahmad and Mustafa were well trained in military skills. In fact, Ahmad, and Mustafa were pleasently plum, and Mustafa died as a result of over eating.
12.
The bottom line, this book reminder of BBC propaganda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33o9U7DtEy8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwWCS88UfG8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl9_t3UjetM
1.
On page 8 this author stated the shah had indeed married the girl, Gilda Soufi... Ottawa obliged. Not even the KGB knew that the shah had taken a fourth wife." According to historical fact, King Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI married three times, and at each time of his marriage, there was monogamy relationship. Thus, this author's claim that the King was involved in a polygamy relationship was false. In addition, this author was reverberating the theocratic regime's propaganda in Iran that the King had a mistress. After careful consideration, this author left a taste that he has a connection with the regime in Iran.
2.
On page 17, this author put a great leverage on 1953 coup which was orchestrated by the US. According to CIA documents, it did not take part in 1953 coup in Iran, the below weblink would shed lights on 1953 coup in Iran.
3.
http://iranzamin2529.blogspot.com/2009/04/1953-coup-detat-in-iran.html
4.
On page 21, this author mentioned that the King called himself, King of Kings or Shahanshah, Light of Aryan. As a matter of fact, it was part of Iran's political culture to refer to all Iranian/Persian monarchs as King of Kings. The Light of Aryan title was given to Him by academic arena. The King also had another title, Great Chief and Commander of of Imperial Army.
5.
On several pages, this author mentioned that SAVAK agents had torture machines in their homes. The above allegation emerged on the surface after victory of 1979 Revolution in Iran. After careful consideration, the above allegation had no merit. First, victims would be in pain and would be making loud noises, so neighbors would know that there were problems. Last, this author claimed that there were victims body parts. Obviously, these places would cause staunch. Currently, there are SAVAK agents all over the world, and none ever brought international courts.
6.
This author mentioned several times about armories were present in the streets. Indeed, in 1970's, Quebec wanted to separate from rest of Canada, and there were individuals that they engaged in terrorist activities. There were marshal laws in place, and absent of civil liberty. Of course, in the above case, the end justify the meaning. However, in case of Pahlavi, it would be constituted as brutality.
7.
On page 50, this author needed to read General Robert Huyser's book " Mission to Tehran" that how he prevented the Imperial Iranian Armed Forces to stage a coup in Iran. In addition, he was puzzled why Carter's administration was forcing General Toufanian to buy more weapons from the US.
8.
This author illustrated bias toward 1979 revolution by calling former Generals with derogatory names while this author was praising the revolutionary people.
9.
This author had no firm grasp of Iran's 1979 Revolution because he was referring to King Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as Reza Pahlavi.
10.
There were plenty of grammar mistakes.
11.
This author also invented his own version of history by claiming that Khomeini's sons, Ahmad and Mustafa were well trained in military skills. In fact, Ahmad, and Mustafa were pleasently plum, and Mustafa died as a result of over eating.
12.
The bottom line, this book reminder of BBC propaganda
Where This World Affair is Heading
It is since January 2011 that the world is witnessing a global chaos. The US pretends that it is not involved, but it is involved. The US is not seeking global stability but global chaos because the US is selling weapons to the nations.
Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi-Blue Eyes People
In this video clip, Hi Imperial Majesty, King of Kings Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI clearly stated that the Western world needed to wake-up, and start being responsible for their action with regard to consumption of fossil fuel. The free ride of fossil fuel had come to an end. In addition, His Imperial Majesty, in His book "Answer to History" predicated that the West would pay more than $75.00 US per barrel.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
US hands in Egypt
It was very puzzling that the US was pursuing policy of regime change in Egypt, and all of sudden it made sense when the TIME magazine mentioned Honsi MUBARAK received his military training in Russia. The article left an impression that since Russia was nemeses of the US, it made Mr. MUBARAK unreliable allied to the US. The article mentioned that after Camp David, 1979 treaty, Egypt was sending recent recruit officers to the US for military training which made them more flexible in regard treating civilians. This portion of the article sent another shock wave that Imperial Iranian Armed Forces during reign of monarchy were trained in the US, and this magazine was cheering for their execution in 1979.
It became clear after reading the Economist, and the TIME magazines that the only reason Egyptian officers did not open fire at demonstrators because they were trained in the US. It was possible that these officers were loyal to the US. In addition, there was a person with name of Wisner who was consulting MUBARAK on foreign and domestic politics and he too like past time of Iran, pushing agenda of human rights with Mubarak. Thus, the US decided to appoint someone in Egypt that s/he would be allied of the US without any kind of Marxist history. Furthermore, the US is using the moment to transform the African nations by eradicating Russia's allies, and establishing the US friends in order to control the region.
Perhaps, the above events explained why Prince Ali Reza PAHLAVI had to die so Crown Prince Reza PAHLAVI would know that He was not allow to emancipate Iran.
It became clear after reading the Economist, and the TIME magazines that the only reason Egyptian officers did not open fire at demonstrators because they were trained in the US. It was possible that these officers were loyal to the US. In addition, there was a person with name of Wisner who was consulting MUBARAK on foreign and domestic politics and he too like past time of Iran, pushing agenda of human rights with Mubarak. Thus, the US decided to appoint someone in Egypt that s/he would be allied of the US without any kind of Marxist history. Furthermore, the US is using the moment to transform the African nations by eradicating Russia's allies, and establishing the US friends in order to control the region.
Perhaps, the above events explained why Prince Ali Reza PAHLAVI had to die so Crown Prince Reza PAHLAVI would know that He was not allow to emancipate Iran.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Do not Cry for Iran
The recent events in Africa which took place in Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia, it sent a shock wave to the regime in Iran that it was at mercy of its people. Once, again, the rouge state in Iran relied on its puppets like Khatami to act as a wise voice for public's frustration. In fact, the state in Iran has all intention to show everyone that who was the boss, and was in-charge of the country. On Monday Feb 14th, 2011 Sanea Jaleh, a 26-year-old was killed by security forces in Iran. Of course, the security forces in Iran are not Iranians, they are from other region of the world that mullahs brought in Iran to suppress Iranians.
Lying is a huge industry in Iran, and the mullahs with their associates like Revolutionary Guards, Besij, and plain clothes are good at lying.
I hope, one day, Iranians would wake-up and realize by following mullahs whether he is wearing a green turban, or white turban, or anything associated with the regime in Iran is not a solution for their problems, but total removal of the rouge IRI was the only key to a better future for everyone. Obvious, the regime will come down with heavy hand on people, and only option is a military intervention to topple the regime in Iran.
Lying is a huge industry in Iran, and the mullahs with their associates like Revolutionary Guards, Besij, and plain clothes are good at lying.
I hope, one day, Iranians would wake-up and realize by following mullahs whether he is wearing a green turban, or white turban, or anything associated with the regime in Iran is not a solution for their problems, but total removal of the rouge IRI was the only key to a better future for everyone. Obvious, the regime will come down with heavy hand on people, and only option is a military intervention to topple the regime in Iran.
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Wednesday, February 02, 2011
Transformation of Middle East
It appears that the Middle East is going through a transformation of Islamization. Turkey is moving toward a conservative theology state. Egypt is brink of collapse in hands of Jihadist, Tunis felt apart because its leader fell off the favor of people, Jordan decided to reform its political restructure by allowing people to elect politicians to the parliament.
One thing is clear, the regime in Iran exported its revolution outside of its border. There is one more ingredient on this stew that Muslim population is on rise compare to other faiths in faster rate. Good luck everyone because you need one.
One thing is clear, the regime in Iran exported its revolution outside of its border. There is one more ingredient on this stew that Muslim population is on rise compare to other faiths in faster rate. Good luck everyone because you need one.
Canada Land of Dictator
I was reading the below paper, and papers, as it proved to me that Canada support dictator by allowing the dictators to invest in Canada, and use Canada for their good times.
http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Members+Tunisia+family+Canada+residents+minister/4153918/story.html
The relatives of ousted Tunisian president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali who arrived in Canada are permanent residents and not asylum-seekers, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney said yesterday.
Kenney, attending a Conservative party meeting in Ottawa, said some members of Ben Ali's family "are permanent residents" and "have the right to be in Canada."
He spoke days after one of Ben Ali's many brothers-in-law arrived in Montreal aboard a private jet accompanied by his wife, their children and a governess, according to news reports confirmed by a government official.
Ben Ali's wife Leila Trabelsi has several brothers, and the official declined to say which one had arrived in Canada. The family reportedly checked into a hotel in Montreal.
A spokesman for a Montrealbased group formed to support Tunisians who have risen up against Ben Ali's government told The Gazette he was dismayed to hear that Canada had allowed his relatives into the country.
"We're very disappointed that Canada has accepted these people who are directly related to the dictatorship and to the family that has been ruling Tunisia for the past 23 years," said Haroun Bouazzi, of the Collectif de solidarite au Canada avec les luttes sociales en Tunisie.
Bouazzi, who was born and raised in Tunisia but has lived in Canada for the past 11 years, said the Canadian government should have refused entry to Ben Ali's family even if they were carrying the proper documentation.
"When Ben Ali left Tunisia, he was still president, and countries like Malta and France didn't accept him even then," he said. "Countries always have a choice to be on the side of the Tunisian people."
An official at Citizenship and Immigration Canada said Saturday that Ottawa was not offering asylum to Ben Ali's family.
Ben Ali fled to Saudi Arabia this month after weeks of violent protests against his iron fisted rule.
Yesterday, hundreds of Tunisians defied a night-time curfew and camped out in front of Prime Minister Mohammed Ghannouchi's office in a bid to force the government to resign.
Protesters said the revolt against Ben Ali has not gone far enough and should be followed up by the removal of all old-regime figures from the leadership and the abolition of Ben Ali's powerful RCD party.
© Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)